Vaccine batches - data distribution demonstrates that a bioweapon is being calibrated

a reply to: nugget1

It's beginning to make more sense now; thanks for the information.
In the beginning I ,too, thought it looked like a depopulation agenda.

They wanted everyone to think it was much more deadly in the beginning so they would know how everyone reacts...

It is obviously a dry run for a much more deadly situation, like in the simulation excercise 'clade x'...



This is a screen shot from clade x.

Cheers
-Driver

originally posted by: TheAiIsLying
Read this last night and it supports this.

www.theburningplatform.com...

He figured out how to merge two separate VAERS data sets and does a bit of SQL magic on them. Seems like a pretty level headed non conspiracy guy, but even he's shocked by it.

Then add more and more "boosters" pills next I guess.

www.theburningplatform.com...

Are we done being stupid yet? Statistically all of the adverse events of any sort are in a handful of lots irrespective of the brand. The rest generate a few bad outcomes while a very, very small number of lots generate a huge percentage of the harm. And no, that’s not tied to age bracketing (therefore who got it first either); some of the worst have average age distributions that are less than lots with lower adverse event rates. It is also not tied to when used either since one of the “better” lots has a first-AE report right at the start of January — as do the “bad” lots.

The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them directly introduce the offending substance into the body. The mechanism of induction is different between the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but both exhibit the same problem.

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: TheAiIsLying
Read this last night and it supports this.

www.theburningplatform.com...

He figured out how to merge two separate VAERS data sets and does a bit of SQL magic on them. Seems like a pretty level headed non conspiracy guy, but even he's shocked by it.

Then add more and more "boosters" pills next I guess.

www.theburningplatform.com...

Are we done being stupid yet? Statistically all of the adverse events of any sort are in a handful of lots irrespective of the brand. The rest generate a few bad outcomes while a very, very small number of lots generate a huge percentage of the harm. And no, that’s not tied to age bracketing (therefore who got it first either); some of the worst have average age distributions that are less than lots with lower adverse event rates. It is also not tied to when used either since one of the “better” lots has a first-AE report right at the start of January — as do the “bad” lots.

The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them directly introduce the offending substance into the body. The mechanism of induction is different between the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but both exhibit the same problem.

The funny thing is that both the WHO and the CEO of Pfizer have come out trying to stop the overzealous use of boosters to try and stop the spread of Omicron. They must be aware of all the discussions going on about all of this and getting a little nervous about this getting out.

I'd like to be confident that this # show is about to collapse under it's own weight, but until the MSM gets on board the normies will never buy it. And we know who's tune they dance to.