It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bank of America helps New World Order

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 12:23 PM
link   
Bank of America is a pawn of the New World Order

Along with most of the privately owned banking cartel ,Bank of America is helping to bring along a cashless society and a new world order.

The sudden loss of 1.2 million accounts is unprecedented in the banking industry and highly suspicious.

900,000 of the accounts were government employees.

Bank of America decided with out back up to load all theese accounts onto tape and ship them to another area of there firm....

They were lost and officials of the bank said they probably ended up in some landfill somewhere.

60% of bank of america stock is owned by the Rothschilds who are big time role players in the new world order and who will one day soon flood the market with there substantial gold holdings making the already flagging dollar and all other world currencys obsolete.

This sudden loss of accounts will be used as ammunition to support the reasoning of going to microchips to replace bank accounts and the great safety and security of having your own chip
....happy,,,,happy....joy....joy..!

of course the first people to recieve theese new chips will be people in government ........Theyll say...."See ....we got ours ....its safe and o.k."




posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 12:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by suppers ready
Bank of America decided with out back up to load all theese accounts onto tape and ship them to another area of there firm....

They were lost and officials of the bank said they probably ended up in some landfill somewhere.


Interesting. Do you have a link to this report?



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 12:33 PM
link   
Yep its the Rothschilds that own all the banks across the world... they are a European Jewish family and they basicly own America becuase they own its money flow.

Money is everything. If you control a countries money then you own that country.

Also, the microchip will be used as the bearers credit card so in order to live, you will have to bear the chip... sick aint it.

The ID card is coming for sure and its the gateway to the microchipped population. These ID cards are intentionally designed to be able to be copied illegally so when the ID card comes, ID theft will become a major problem and the solution the government will offer is the microchip. It's called problem - reaction - solution. Good for getting what you want when you know the public will refuse it outright.



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 12:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by kinglizard

Originally posted by suppers ready
Bank of America decided with out back up to load all theese accounts onto tape and ship them to another area of there firm....

They were lost and officials of the bank said they probably ended up in some landfill somewhere.


Interesting. Do you have a link to this report?


www.msnbc.msn.com...

and the bank of america stock continues to rise despite this complete and utter disgrace of there ability to protect there customers....oops sorry we lost 1.2 million accounts....nobody even really questioned it....the powers that be do what they want and its accepted as the truth by about 99.999 percent of the population...


[edit on 18-3-2005 by suppers ready]



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 12:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by suppers ready
the powers that be do what they want and its accepted as the truth by about 99.999 percent of the population...


[edit on 18-3-2005 by suppers ready]


Frustrating aint it?


Cug

posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 01:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by suppers ready

The sudden loss of 1.2 million accounts is unprecedented in the banking industry and highly suspicious.

900,000 of the accounts were government employees.

Bank of America decided with out back up to load all theese accounts onto tape and ship them to another area of there firm....

They were lost and officials of the bank said they probably ended up in some landfill somewhere.


At least get your data right, what they lost WAS the backup tape that contained information on 1.2 million people that could lead to identity theft. Now it was very very very stupid of them to have the tapes in checked baggage on a airline. Like they will never get lost that way.




60% of bank of america stock is owned by the Rothschilds who are big time role players in the new world order and who will one day soon flood the market with there substantial gold holdings making the already flagging dollar and all other world currencys obsolete.


That is incorrect finance.yahoo.com... You can see that all of the "Institutional & Mutual Fund Owners" in total hold 62% of the stock so there is no way the Rothschilds could hold 60%



This sudden loss of accounts will be used as ammunition to support the reasoning of going to microchips to replace bank accounts and the great safety and security of having your own chip
....happy,,,,happy....joy....joy..!


All this is gona do is make some IT firm a bunch of bucks by selling the Bank of America encryption software to safeguard their tapes.



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 01:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Novusordo
Yep its the Rothschilds that own all the banks across the world... they are a European Jewish family and they basicly own America becuase they own its money flow.




why is the fact that they are jewish significant ?



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 01:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Novusordo
Yep its the Rothschilds that own all the banks across the world... they are a European Jewish family and they basicly own America becuase they own its money flow.


Originally posted by syrinx high priest
why is the fact that they are jewish significant ?


Ask the Rothchilds? They mention it enough in speeches or on most of their websites. They always love to point out they're German/Jewish.

Also, the Rothchilds are not big American bankers yet. They're only 9th in the world and 4th in Europe (by announced mergers and acquisitions year-to-date October 2004).



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 05:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Odium

Originally posted by Novusordo
Yep its the Rothschilds that own all the banks across the world... they are a European Jewish family and they basicly own America becuase they own its money flow.


Originally posted by syrinx high priest
why is the fact that they are jewish significant ?


Ask the Rothchilds? They mention it enough in speeches or on most of their websites. They always love to point out they're German/Jewish.

Also, the Rothchilds are not big American bankers yet. They're only 9th in the world and 4th in Europe (by announced mergers and acquisitions year-to-date October 2004).


They own the U.S federal reserve...



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 06:29 PM
link   
Still not the largest bank in the World of America, they're 9th in the World. Accept it.



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 06:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Odium
Still not the largest bank in the World of America, they're 9th in the World. Accept it.


WHere did you get that stat from?

It could easily be a lie.



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 06:41 PM
link   
The company does most of its business as an M&A advisor. According to the Dealogic league tables it has a strong position in Paris and London but remains a relatively weak player in New York. The groups ranking is number 4 among European advisers (by announced mergers and acquisitions year-to-date October 2004) with 160 deals with a value of $137.08 billion, and globally as number 9 with 197 deals with a value of $150.50 billion. Goldman Sachs leads in both Europe and globally with 258 deals worth $448.98 billion.

The annual revenue of the Rothschild group is €828 million with a shareholder equity of €1 billion (2003). To compete more effectively with the New York giants the Rothschild groups main branches in Paris, London, and New York merged into one holding company, Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG, under David de Rothschild's leadership. David de Rothschild is opposed to an IPO, much like competitor Lazard's LLC chairman Michel David-Weill.

en.wikipedia.org...

They are getting bigger, a lot bigger but they still are not the biggest -yet- they just have the best growth.

Will you give your sources at last or do you plan to keep breaknig the ATS terms of service? I'm just waiting for an Admin to notice, you never back up your statements and never do when asked.


[edit on 18-3-2005 by Odium]



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 06:44 PM
link   
The Rothschilds are a joke. The real playas don't write press releases about how much of their gold they plan to sell off in the next year. The only active family members are basically shills for people trading on their name. About like Krupps.

Talk about real assets. The Queen of England is way richer than the whole of B of A and the Rothschild operations combined. But I guess you're bored with her since she ain't Jewish.


You're whole thesis is off, anyways. The Reserve has to print record numbers of 20's every year. If anything, we are FURTHER from a cashless society with every passing bank holiday not closer. You ought to read Alvin Toffler's "Megatrends." Or any of his stuff. Basically, the economic winners are the ones who offer choices, not railroad peole. Smart cards will be only one asset.

I recently paid for a relative's expensive medical procedure. The nurse complained that the Dr.'s office had to buy a safe because so many people now pay cash.

A friend who manages an apartment complex says that probably half the tenants pay their rent in cash; where as before 9-11 no one did.

If you listen to financial advisors, they will tell you the first step to getting out of debt is to switch to cash in envelopes.

more and more people are doing it. And more cash is needed every day.

So I just can't get that freaked out over B of A which is an incompetent institution anyways.



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 06:48 PM
link   
I would like to know where you get the idea the Queen has money. Any sites or statistics for it? I can remember her being in financial worry, not long ago. (Living in England and all, it got fairly big because the Government helped her with money.)



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 07:06 PM
link   
I thought the Rothschilds were the richest guys in the world and were the money arm of the New World Order.... thats whats accepted amoung all conspiracys and theorists.

I supose they can still be the money arm of the NWO even though their ranked 9?

Confused



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 07:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Novusordo
I thought the Rothschilds were the richest guys in the world and were the money arm of the New World Order.... thats whats accepted amoung all conspiracys and theorists.

I supose they can still be the money arm of the NWO even though their ranked 9?

Confused


Link

Rothschild are just the richest Jews in the World. So they get a lot of attention. The really rich people, you don't know their names. They hide it well.

[edit on 18-3-2005 by Odium]



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 07:26 PM
link   
Well, actually, it's pretty difficult to find some trustworthy numbers. Basically, at a certain level of wealth, the list seems to be made up of people who declare themselves. Obviously, if you don't WANT to be on such a list, you just stay quiet and get overlooked.

Drudge report and Forbes' lists look identical, like they didn't even bother to do independent research:

www.drudgereport.com...
www.forbes.com...

What I have done just now is googled this article:

www.findaproperty.co.uk...

and calculated GBP/USD converstion at 1.92 pounds to the dollar. This gives about $7.8 Bil for QEII. (which would make her # 53 on Forbes list.)

On the other hand, I believe that the 7.8 only includes her British assets. I saw a report ~2000 that claimed that her total foreign and domestic assest totalled 19 Billion, which would put her at number 8 on Forbes' world-wide list.

Now that I've started looking into this, I don't believe ANY of these lists are the least bit realistic. For years, the Sultan of Brunei topped every list. But after he became a target for American porn-stars on the make, his name disappeared off of all lists.

How do the Rothschilds rank, BTW? I can't find them in the top 150 on Forbes' list.



posted on Mar, 18 2005 @ 07:28 PM
link   
Link above, shows their business. In 1750, they had nearly 6Billion! IN 1750! They also got the Russian Zsar's money. Which was a hell of a lot..:|



posted on Mar, 29 2005 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cug


That is incorrect finance.yahoo.com... You can see that all of the "Institutional & Mutual Fund Owners" in total hold 62% of the stock so there is no way the Rothschilds could hold 60%


Not all there holdings are listed under the Rothschild name my good man....



posted on Mar, 29 2005 @ 03:05 PM
link   
Most of theese so called official lists are about individuals not
"families".........the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers have holdings that are astronomical.....The Rockefellers alone make more money off there pharmaceutical holdings and there ownership of national fuel gas in one year than Bill gates has made in his entire life....if you consider the power that theese two families have and the consolidated power they can wield along with some of the other bildebergers and club of rome scumbags ....it is beyond belief....they are the people who write foreign policy for america behind the scenes.....that is just a small part of how they control the world thru third party politics and the Hegelian dialectic......




top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join