BREAKING: List of Pennsylvania voters older than USA´s oldest living person

originally posted by: PeppermintButler
This could also be a typo. 0 and 9 keys are right next to each other and it is very possible data was entered as 1900 when it should have been 1990.

You would get different types of typos on a numeric keypad, the ones on full keyboards, the best for data entry, as it's much faster to enter numbers that way.

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
So to conclude, my point was that it is pure speculation that the 01/01/1900 dates are software "glitches" because of empty date fields since we have zero knowledge about the programming language and database system that they´ve used.

Those are not glitches, they are the way things work.

Anyone used to work with a specific system would know how they work and would (should) prepare things according to it.

To me, it looks like they used several different systems and joined all the data in some way without accounting for those differences.

However we look at it, it shows, at least, a lack of uniformity in the way of doing things, which can only result in confusion when the data is put together without thinking about those differences.

Even if there wasn't any large scale fraud, the gathering and processing of data used for the voting system in the US needs to be reviewed and revamped to, at least, avoid uncertainty from all sides about the validity of the results.

There's no fraud.
There's no evidence of fraud.
Okay sure, a few isolated cases.
Alright fraud in every swing state Biden won.
Yep lots of fraud, but not nearly enough to swing an election.

You can see where the pattern is going. It's only a matter of time before:

There was enough fraud to change a handful of counties in the swing states to give Biden a win.

originally posted by: jjkenobi
There's no fraud.
There's no evidence of fraud.
Okay sure, a few isolated cases.
Alright fraud in every swing state Biden won.
Yep lots of fraud, but not nearly enough to swing an election.

You can see where the pattern is going. It's only a matter of time before:

There was enough fraud to change a handful of counties in the swing states to give Biden a win.

Then, why. isn't. trump. stating. this. in. court?

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: PeppermintButler

We don´t have to prove more that we have already done if there is becomes court case imo, they´ll have to prove all this is just clerical error or software "glithces."

-MM

I'm all for reviewing this, but "dead" people voting is not a new problem. You would certainly need to prove in court that these votes were counted to prove fraud. Dead people getting sent ballots is nothing new; the Social Security Death Index is checked for each person and if they are marked dead on that they ballot is stamped "dead" and not counted. You would certainly have to prove that this wasn't done.

originally posted by: PeppermintButler

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: PeppermintButler

We don´t have to prove more that we have already done if there is becomes court case imo, they´ll have to prove all this is just clerical error or software "glithces."

-MM

I'm all for reviewing this, but "dead" people voting is not a new problem. You would certainly need to prove in court that these votes were counted to prove fraud. Dead people getting sent ballots is nothing new; the Social Security Death Index is checked for each person and if they are marked dead on that they ballot is stamped "dead" and not counted. You would certainly have to prove that this wasn't done.

These "dead" people requested mail-in ballots, and returned them signed, then they were approved by the government - that is what the PA data file shows - so it was not just mail-in ballots sent and not being returned, dead people actually voted by mail-in ballots.

-MM

I imported that csv file into SQL, as it allows easier data manipulation than Excel, and got this:

Ballots requested by voters born before 1905-08-15: 608
Ballots mailed for those 608: 350
Ballots returned from those 350: 155
Date of birth and number of voters for those 155 returned ballots:
(empty) - 88
1800-01-01 - 37
1800-06-21 - 1
1850-08-14 - 1
1854-08-10 - 1
1890-06-18 - 1
1894-03-13 - 1
1894-11-17 - 1
1895-01-18 - 1
1896-03-13 - 1
1898-06-24 - 1
1900-01-01 - 6
1900-05-20 - 1
1900-07-03 - 1
1900-08-22 - 1
1900-09-04 - 1
1900-10-27 - 1
1900-12-07 - 1
1901-01-01 - 4
1901-04-06 - 1
1903-09-23 - 1
1903-12-16 - 1
1904-03-12 - 1
1904-07-12 - 1

Whatever happened needs to be sorted out, but 155 returned ballots out of total of 3,098,705 doesn't sound like a big problem.

Why should death negate your vote? What's next? Disabled folks can't vote? Slippery slope folks. Be careful what you wish for!

/s

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
These "dead" people requested mail-in ballots, and returned them signed, then they were approved by the government - that is what the PA data file shows - so it was not just mail-in ballots sent and not being returned, dead people actually voted by mail-in ballots.

In all the above there's one thing the data file doesn't show, that they are dead, it only shows a supposed birth date.

a reply to: ArMaP

Nice work. If they´re born before 1905 they´re dead.

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

If.