Twitter CEO Doesn't Know That Voter Fraud Exists

Here's another clip of Ted Cruz grilling Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for censoring all tweets exposing voter fraud:



The silicon valley cultist (looking like he just walked out of a Bohemian Grove ceremony) actually has the balls to say "I don't know" when asked whether or not voter fraud exists...

Who in their right mind doesn't know? serious TDS leftists can downplay and deflect instances of voter fraud but few would outright deny it exists at all. This is some god-tier deflection and blatant unashamed lies.

This guy runs the second largest free speech platform in the world... He should be charged with assisting in the fraud and should be investigated to see how complicit he really is in the greatest political scam in history.

originally posted by: CollateralDramage
Who in their right mind doesn't know?

Rudy for one, he just told the judge in the case over in Pennsylvania yesterday that there wasn't any voter fraud. Guess he would know and all being that he's the President's personal attorney.

a reply to: CollateralDramage

My question is, which american election in the last 25 years hasn't contained any voter fraud at all?

Tonight on News at 11: Jack Dorsey admits he is an idiot.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

A three minute video in two minutes.

I think that's a new record even for you...

originally posted by: CollateralDramage
A three minute video in two minutes.

I think that's a new record even for you...

Your question wasn't in the video, was it?

But it was answered by none other than Rudy Giuliani.

a reply to: dug88

I'd say zero.

In the history of virtually all elections...

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

There must be something wrong with your ears cause' it's literally the first question Cruz asks...

originally posted by: CollateralDramage
There must be something wrong with your ears cause' it's literally the first question Cruz asks...

Your question was 'who in their right mind doesn't know (that there's voter fraud)?'. Rudy answered your question.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: CollateralDramage
Who in their right mind doesn't know?

Rudy for one, he just told the judge in the case over in Pennsylvania yesterday that there wasn't any voter fraud. Guess he would know and all being that he's the President's personal attorney.

Seems like its a just a “game” to keep controlling his cult.

And they’re eating it up.

People don‘t want to listen to facts and reality right now.

Smack exacerbates this tendency a thousand fold.

Highly ototoxic, it damages the complex hearing
process, which process is the least understood of all the senses.

A person who constantly chips can physically hear
better than when not strung out* but the brain just
cannot process the context. Eventually, with chronic use,
the mechanics become damaged, which meshes nicely
when trying to reconcile delusional thinking with reality.
Eventually an equilibrium is reached.

Yes. A landslide of hate is coming my way, however,
ethics matter not since there is no God
to judge me, and I am a multi billionaire.
This means I am intelligent, powerful, and well insulated.
So long as I am insincere, I cannot be charged or arrested for anything.
No one ever got hurt from my collusion to fix.

The obvious next step is to persist with the delusions,
and to lie publicly to save face, no matter the outcome.
It is not against the law to delude oneself, and to be truthful
will put me in legal difficulty.

# 1250

* many classical masterpieces were influenced by opiates, as a matter of routine.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: CollateralDramage
Who in their right mind doesn't know?

Rudy for one, he just told the judge in the case over in Pennsylvania yesterday that there wasn't any voter fraud. Guess he would know and all being that he's the President's personal attorney.

could you link that please?

a reply to: Annee

Oh so "the right" is a cult now. Got it.

a reply to: Annee

It's a month long distraction that's kept people entertained, outraged and fighting over most of November with no sign of ending before December. Then, they'll tidy it all up and prepare us all for a very Merry covid Christmas.

a reply to: CollateralDramage

Are you upset your question was answered by Rudy with a reply you don't agree with?

originally posted by: network dude
could you link that please?

Brann later got Giuliani to admit that ― despite his claims of mass voter fraud during oral argument ― the Trump campaign’s argument did not “plead fraud with particularity.”

The legal translation for that is: "we don't have proof of fraud".

originally posted by: CollateralDramage
Unless you're sourcing your information from bizzaro world I have no clue what you're talking about. According to the Wall Street Journal he has taken the exact opposite position you claim:

That's what he claimed, then his drunk geezer ass got dismembered in court. See above.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Take a screenshot of the quote where Giuliani rescinded his position on fraud.

We'll wait.