"Is covid-19 an inflated exaggerated hoax?"
Yes.
There are many different interests at play.
You have big pharma who is absolutely drooling at the prospects of the obscene amounts of money they're going to make when their vaccines are produced
and sold. It's in their interests to push Covid-19 scaremongering as hard as possible, and they have the money and influence to do so.
You have hospitals and other healthcare providers who were given financial incentive to diagnose as many people as possible with Covid-19, treat as
many as possible, and attribute as many deaths as possible to Covid-19 - because they're given more money the more supposed Covid-19 patients are
being treated and/or dying. Various officials have admitted that sometimes even suicides and car accidents are being called Covid-19 deaths for the
sake of inflating these numbers.
You have politicians (mainly Democrats) who are pushing Covid-19 scaremongering so they can have something to use against Trump - mainly by convincing
people that scores of people are dying horribly because of Trump's decisions, whereas the Democrats act like they wouldn't have let it happen due to
their superior leadership. This angle is being used, so it's in their interests to make Covid-19 seem as dangerous and deadly as possible.
You have problems with the data itself. From the start, the data has been flawed, wrong, manipulated, and twisted to fit narratives. For example,
"cases". "Oh no, there are 50,000 cases of Covid-19 in this place!". What is a "case", when they use the word? Is it someone who was tested 6 months
ago? Is it someone who was tested and shows that they already had Covid-19 and now have antibodies and likely won't get it for another year? How were
they tested? What did the tests test for - Covid-19, or coronaviruses in general, like the common cold? What kind of tests were used, and are they
even reliable and accurate? Are the "cases" people who are asymptomatic and/or not contagious?
Cases are just one issue. Another example is the mortality rate. Some data may say Covid-19 has up to a 5% mortality rate, while other data may say
it's less harmful than the common cold. How is it being calculated? What numbers are being compared to what other numbers? The mortality rate will
look drastically different depending on this. For example, if you take only people who have tested positive for Covid-19 and call this "cases" and
then take all of the people who have died WITH Covid-19 and call these Covid-19 deaths, you'll have a drastically higher mortality rate than you would
if you add in all of the other people who also had Covid-19 but weren't tested or weren't sick enough to show symptoms, and then subtract the people
who died BECAUSE OF Covid-19 from the ones who died WITH Covid-19.
All data can be easily manipulated to say what someone wants it to say, and this has proven to be the case many times over when it comes to this hoax
pandemic. Whenever data is involved or being referenced, we need to actually think critically about it instead of reacting to buzzwords and lies.
And then you have China...
Maybe they released Covid-19 by accident out of sheer incompetence. Maybe another one of their scientists sold yet another infected bat to the wet
market for meat for some extra money on the side. Maybe China released it on purpose for economic or political purposes. I do remember at the
beginning seeing a bunch of videos being released all over the internet of people falling dead in the streets in China. Why? This was seen nowhere
else in the world. It's almost like these videos were created and released intentionally to cause panic around the world, solidified by China locking
down, welding people into their homes, and spraying truckloads of God knows what chemicals into the air, turning their cities into giant
clouds.
edit on 10/13/2020 by trollz because: (no reason given)
edit on 10/13/2020 by trollz because: (no reason
given)