Wanted: Honest intelligent productive thinking to resolve the issue God exists or not.

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
a reply to: neutronflux

I'll take that as a yes. Too bad.

How many times have I quoted the Bible compared to the dictionary. And I quoted the Bible in posts long before the dictionary.

And the only thing I did was correct “your” faulty definition of faith with the excepted definition of faith.

So you just got caught in another blatant false lie, and ignorant argument.

a reply to: Out6of9Balance

Would you care to troll with more false accusations with no founding in reality.

When you have done nothing to glorify the one god you claim exists.

a reply to: Out6of9Balance

How many sources have you cited other than your ego?

a reply to: neutronflux

Why didn't you simply replied with a no then to make things clear for us all?

Waahaa, I think I'm going to cry.

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
Waahaa, I think I'm going to cry.

Play stupid games. Win stupid awards.

a reply to: neutronflux

That's life.

a reply to: Out6of9Balance

Now. In the context of this thread. Do you have actual evidence of god.

a reply to: neutronflux

I thought you said you weren't lacking any?

Are you a liar?

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
a reply to: neutronflux

I thought you said you weren't lacking any?

Are you a liar?

Then quote the post where I made such a claim in this thread. And I not referring to myself, I am referring to the context of this thread.

a reply to: Out6of9Balance

Or do you want to agree that faith is enough. Making this thread a moot point.

I never had such a senseless conversation before.

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
a reply to: neutronflux

I thought you said you weren't lacking any?

Are you a liar?

Probably because you literally make up crap.

Now.

Then quote the post where I made such a claim in this thread. And I not referring to myself, I am referring to the context of this thread.

a reply to: neutronflux

I'm not your toy and if you can 't remember what you post then that's your problem.

Do you by any chance have proof to present yourself so we can end this?

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
a reply to: neutronflux

I'm not your toy and if you can 't remember what you post then that's your problem.

Do you by any chance have proof to present yourself so we can end this?

It’s obvious your not here for intellectually honest debate. And all remaining doubts about your trolling removed. Good luck with future trolling.

a reply to: neutronflux

That's not proof. You contributed nothing to this thread.

originally posted by: neutronflux

Now. In the context of this thread. Do you have actual evidence of god.

You can not debate faith since the more proof one needs the less faith one has. We cannot debate what is outside of our universe either. We can speculate but everyone is as right or wrong as anyone else, so not much of a debate.

Its like evolution vs God in that isn't a possible debate either since one side is debating the "why is life here" based only on faith and the other side is not debating the "why" but the how life evolves through time. The two arguments are not even similar to have a debate.

But we still do in a never ending loop with both...lol

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance

That's not proof. You contributed nothing to this thread.

argumentum ad ignorantiam

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Out6of9Balance

You don’t need “evidence” of god if you have a personal relationship with God.

Man you just don’t get it.

Aha! Dear Neutron, you are into the fallacy of special pleading.

.

originally posted by: Pachomius

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Out6of9Balance

You don’t need “evidence” of god if you have a personal relationship with God.

Man you just don’t get it.

Aha! Dear Neutron, you are into the fallacy of special pleading.

.

By all means, quote a fallacy of mine from from this thread.