This topic is in the War On Terrorism discussion forum.  (rss)


U.S. might ask NATO to take over control of Iraq occupation




Topic started on 10-7-2003 @ 03:40 AM by CoLD aNGeR


As in the site where i did find this article this sentence belongs to it:

"Here, you deal with the mess; we gotta go invade someone or other..."

WASHINGTON -- With American costs and casualties mounting in Iraq, the Bush administration is showing new interest in putting NATO in charge of the military occupation as a way of scaling back the U.S. troop commitment, U.S. and NATO officials say.

Such a change would discomfit some administration hard-liners, as it would force the United States to share decision-making on Iraq with European leaders who opposed the U.S.-led invasion, analysts said. It might also require seeking a mandate from the United Nations Security Council, which the United States failed to get before launching the war to topple Saddam Hussein.

But as the single most powerful nation in NATO, the United States would retain military command while spreading the burden and costs among a number of nations, thereby easing demands on overstretched American forces, diplomats said.

"There is interest" in turning the mission over to NATO, although not right away, a senior Bush administration official said yesterday. "I think the American public would be pleased to see NATO helping us in Iraq. ... Americans believe in NATO and would consider it a plus to have NATO secure Iraq."

Rest of the article:
www.sunspot.net...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-7-2003 @ 08:23 AM by Tyriffic


Actually, maybe your euro friends will get a taste of the mess too. I wouldn't mind a bit, as long as the Iraqis still acchieve the goal of establishing their own government.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-7-2003 @ 09:29 AM by 29MV29


Does that mean NATO will be in full control of Iraqi oil? Or is the U.S. conveniently maintaining control of them.

NATO Homepage



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-7-2003 @ 10:06 AM by CoLD aNGeR



Originally posted by 29MV29
Does that mean NATO will be in full control of Iraqi oil? Or is the U.S. conveniently maintaining control of them.

NATO Homepage



Very good question, buy i guess, nato pays the rebuiling, and Us get´s the oil.
Remember Kosovo and Yugoslavia and so on?
Nato paid all also europe, but at the end, the companies rebuilding the country and the balcans are americans, and guess who paid to them EUROPE!!! yeahhhh nice isn´t ?
Anyway doesn´t matter, europe america or whatever they are all Tools for the cabal, we just play their game and believe it...
It´s time to wake up!!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.004 seconds
Page processed in 0.086 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread