House GOP Release List of Witnesses For Impeachment Hearings

The GOP witness list has finally come out and they are looking for the following individuals to testify:

1) Devin Archer

2) Hunter Biden

3) Alexandra Chalupa

4) David Hale

5) Tim Morrison

6) Nellie Ohr

7) Kurt Volker

8) Whistleblower

9) All individuals relied up by Eric whistleblower in drafting his complaint.

twitter.com...

www.foxnews.com...

www.washingtonpost.com... a-8501-2a7123a38c58_story.html


Will they all testify?

MODS - Thread was meant to be posted in breaking news.


MOD NOTE
moved to Breaking Political News

a reply to: BrennanHuff22
I wouldn’t put it past the deep state to have all of their star witnesses rubbed out in mob style hits and blame President Trump for doing it.

The interesting one to me is Devin Archer.

They're covering all the bases. Too bad Schiff won't let them be questioned.

Congressman: "Mr TheWistleBlower, when is the first time you met with Adam Schiff or his staff?"

a reply to: BrennanHuff22

Everyone of their scripts look like this.



I don't answer questions.

a reply to: TomLawless

Schiff received an official letter last night requesting that he himself testify (in closed session).

Source: www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: BrennanHuff22

The key question is, will shifty schiff allow it? They seem to be making up the rules as they go.

a reply to: BrennanHuff22

Looks like the Republicans are wanting to turn the impeachment hearings into an investigation into Hunter Biden.

Here’s a question ?

If Adam Schiff is subpoenaed (#9) can he or the Democrats deny it with the new rules .

Without showing partisan conflict of interest by ruling on theirselves ?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: BrennanHuff22

Looks like the Republicans are wanting to turn the impeachment hearings into an investigation into Hunter Biden.

You cant do one without the other.

If trump's defense is he was looking into corruption then proving g that corruption is paramount.

Dems need to think long and hard a bu out going down this road in light if what we already know.

a reply to: BrennanHuff22

Do they have a choice if they are called as a witness to testify?

a reply to: Edumakated

If trump's defense is he was looking into corruption then proving g that corruption is paramount.

Trump isn't being impeached because of his, so far, unfounded conspiracy theories. He's being impeached for trying to force a foreign government into legitimizing his conspiracy theory, to help him in this 2020 reelection bid.

If Republicans think they can derail the impeachment hearings, to try to force the House of Representatives to legitimize Trump's excuses for violating his oath of office, I think they are in for a disappointment.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Edumakated

If trump's defense is he was looking into corruption then proving g that corruption is paramount.

Trump isn't being impeached because of his, so far, unfounded conspiracy theories. He's being impeached for trying to force a foreign government into legitimizing his conspiracy theory, to help him in this 2020 reelection bid.

If Republicans think they can derail the impeachment hearings, to try to force the House of Representatives to legitimize Trump's excuses for violating his oath of office, I think they are in for a disappointment.

Well if it is just a conspiracy theory then there should be no worries when the witnesses are called.

A conspiracy theory where we have Joe Biden admitting to on camera. Not too mention other Obama officials questioning the ethics of it.

Not only that... if you read the transcript in its entirety it is clear trump wasnt even talking g about Biden initially but crowd Strike.

Denial is not a river....

Yes I think we can hear these people out because the democrats over the last three years propped up the russiagate conspiracy theory it cost the country millions and produced nothing. I honestly don’t think democrats or moderates really get the right to call this an unfounded conspiracy theory. this honestly can be construed as trumps first real attempt at uncovering it the bs behind Russia gate and it got linked to a Biden crime that is actually much more obviously extortion.

Yes they tried to derail the investigation before it happened during the supposed crime you say trump committed

a reply to: Edumakated

Amazing right.

The only two instances that Trump was at interested in. in the interest of "corruption" are crowdstrike and Burisma.

Crowdstrike the thing that Manfort started claiming.

Burisma an issue that solely hinges on someone's son working at.

Yeah not political at all

Manfort had 4 investigations dropped against him in Ukraine just days after a visit from Guliani. Is Trump for corruption or against it because his actions and the actions of his proxies suggest he is for it.

a reply to: TomLawless

What does Nellie Ohr have to do with anything?
That list is a distraction. A joke.
But we can play. Let them testify.

Nothing to hide.

Did I see it on here, that the right believes everyone who testified under oath is lying and those who refused to testify are telling the truth? Because it sure seems that is the circus we are watching.

So indeed, lets get those folks under oath and have them laugh in the faces of the jokester interrogators who want to inquire about some fictitious "insurance policy".

Bring on the clowns and the tiny cars. I love this part of the show.

a reply to: Edumakated

Well if it is just a conspiracy theory then there should be no worries when the witnesses are called.

The House of Representatives has no need to legitimize Trump's excuse for violating his oath of office by diving down a debunked conspiracy rabbit hole.

Not only that... if you read the transcript in its entirety it is clear trump wasnt even talking g about Biden initially but crowd Strike.

The House of Representatives has no need to give Trump a redo on the Mueller Report, and it's findings, in order to impeach Trump for extorting a foreign government into giving him a Mueller report redo.

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Edumakated

Amazing right.

The only two instances that Trump was at interested in. in the interest of "corruption" are crowdstrike and Burisma.

Crowdstrike the thing that Manfort started claiming.

Burisma an issue that solely hinges on someone's son working at.

Yeah not political at all

Manfort had 4 investigations dropped against him in Ukraine just days after a visit from Guliani. Is Trump for corruption or against it because his actions and the actions of his proxies suggest he is for it.

Wow it’s now manfort’s idea now to look into crowdstrike not that it’s an obvious target.

originally posted by: Veryolduser

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Edumakated

Amazing right.

The only two instances that Trump was at interested in. in the interest of "corruption" are crowdstrike and Burisma.

Crowdstrike the thing that Manfort started claiming.

Burisma an issue that solely hinges on someone's son working at.

Yeah not political at all

Manfort had 4 investigations dropped against him in Ukraine just days after a visit from Guliani. Is Trump for corruption or against it because his actions and the actions of his proxies suggest he is for it.

Wow it’s now manfort’s idea now to look into crowdstrike not that it’s an obvious target.

Why does that factoid surprise you?