It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jeremy Corbyn challenges UK government's Iran accusations on oil tanker attacks

page: 3
4
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 09:31 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You don't poke a bear with big teeth that has you surrounded on all sides and expect no reaction.

They are already implicated.

This won't make anyone back off, certainly not the USA/UK or the rest of our allies involved.

All it will serve to achieve is to inflame the situation and possibly give a reason, imaginary or otherwise, towards greenlighting Bolton's invasion of Iran.

Which is probably why and how it was orchestrated.




posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 10:52 AM
link   
Those weren't Iranians in that grainy little recon video, they were American actors.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: r0xor

I'm more interested in what was pulled from the side of the ship.

Where did that go? And what was that?



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 11:21 AM
link   
as trump said by his last visit to the uk . .. brittain can look forwards foto an wonderfull trade deal....

that explains hunt agree to the accusation...



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 12:32 PM
link   
The world is a lot more saavy about intelligence evidence since Wikileaks and then Snowden. Heck Obama was just bemoaning deep fake videos in theEU just the other day. All video evidence is now suspect, regardless of source. So even though Jeremy Corbyn seems to be pretty much hated in his own country, what he is saying makes sense: GIVE ME MORE EVIDENCE. Kinda like DENY IGNORANCE isn't it?

BTW, I know nothing of Corbyn, his politics or reputation and I'm not a supporter or a fan of his.

I've said it before in another thread that a real investigation needs to be completed to resolve the misinformation from all parties: ship owners, crew, Captain, government(s) - all trying to get info out there without relevance. When did the crew see something flying? When did the explosion occur? Didn't the crew choose to evacuate because they saw a mine attached after the first explosion? Who saw the flying torpedo?

Don't even get me started about the potential disinfo agents pushing a narrative. We've got enough problems getting the story straight. How about some forensics on the composition of the blast materials? Would go a long way towards figuring out the FACTS. Rogue elements on any side could actually be responsible. Remember the White Helmets gas attack hoax?

ganjoa



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 12:45 PM
link   
a reply to: CthruU

Flying torpedoes?



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: gortex

Silly ... false flags only happen when psychos open fire on a crowd.

Funny when a real false flag comes along they don't recognize it.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 01:28 PM
link   
dupe.


edit on 6152019 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990




Btw, nobody is fit to lead... Till a naked lass in a lake throws a sword off some poor unsuspecting fools head


Is this an attempt to put the Plantagenets back on the throne? lol



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Well, it canny be any worse than the ""German Lizards"" who currently occupy said throne.


Probably a reference to Arthurian Legend, "The Lady In The Lake" to be more precise.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

I hope you are wrong.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

What about, Arthurian Legend or German Lizards?

No exactly like either of the two carry much veracity in tow.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Weapons that could not be considered weapons of mass destruction unless they were fired at a Catholic church at 10AM on a Sunday morning.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Is that some kind "Bloody Sunday" reference or other inference to the troubles?

I'm not seeing the connection between weapons of mass destruction located in nations in the middle east and Irelands dilemma.

Or have i missed something? LoL



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

I don't know but to hear trump it has Iran written all over it. I don't know if you are familiar with american cartoons but ACME from the Roadrunner cartoon comes to mind.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:27 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Yes Indeed. I love the history of Great Britain.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

I am hence the reason i responded with "Meep Meep".

They want to invade Iran, Trump will facilitate them if it gets him another 4 years.

That nations days under the present regime are numbered by the world bank and there ilk.

And it plain as the light of day really.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Oh I was saying I hope you are wrong about it being America that is responsible.

Not about King Arthur or the Lizards who took his family off the throne.

You know you write with a Sco-ish accent lad?



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Aye well, its there and all, ile give you that.

And we did have some of the great storytellers to punt the whole affair.

A rich and varied tapestry really, most of which is probably as about as accurate as the Bible.

But its some good crack all the same if somewhat skewered in our favor.

Then again its the victors who write history and not the vanquished.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

nah reference to the word mass.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join