It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There were 15 shooting deaths by police of unarmed black men in the United States in 2018, according to official data compiled by The Washington Post.
Data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation showed that in 2017, there were 2,627 murders of blacks by other blacks in the United States.
Year after year, the statistics don’t support that narrative, and 2018 was no exception. The political left in America incessantly characterizes the police and the country itself as racist, in part based on the occurrence of police shootings, even with the statistically paltry numbers of officer-involved shooting deaths.
And while they routinely rile their base by mischaracterizing police shooting data as they engage in demagoguery of political opposition, they ignore a real crisis within the black community—the thousands of blacks who are shot every year by non-police.
It’s precisely this lack of attention to the biggest problem concerning violence in black communities that leads many to suspect that, for Democrats, black lives don’t really matter, just black votes.
“The vogue commentary of the liberal left in the 21st century is to drone on about the many failures of the white devils. Those evil white supremacists who are invariably described as conservative Republicans,” Tamara Enalls-Fenner, author of “How the Democrats Destroyed the Black Community … and No One Noticed” told me in an interview.
“It’s a dog bone thrown by the dog whisperers of today, calling for an attack on an entire group of people who have nothing to do with the [15] shootings of unarmed black men who fell prey to the weapon of a police officer in 2018.”
Note: The article states 15 – WAPO reports 18
That numbers pales in comparison to the amount of deaths attributed to black on black violence. Since there are too many to make a media spectacle over, the tragedy will go largely unnoticed.
Black live only matter when their deaths can fuel a political agenda.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: DemonicCensorship
Note: The article states 15 – WAPO reports 18
That numbers pales in comparison to the amount of deaths attributed to black on black violence. Since there are too many to make a media spectacle over, the tragedy will go largely unnoticed.
Yeah, there's obviously a huge issue with violence within black communities in the US that needs to be addressed and never seems to get much MSM attention.
Still though, 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Afterall, it's pretty well established that black people are generally treated far more harshly by police than their caucasian peers. It's also an established fact that black people are far more likely to be incarcerated than white people for committing equivalent crimes.
Note: The article states 15 – WAPO reports 18
originally posted by: neo96
Black live only matter when their deaths can fuel a political agenda.
Chicago is proof of that.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: neo96
Black live only matter when their deaths can fuel a political agenda.
Chicago is proof of that.
Yes. And in Chicago, police know who the shooters are, because of thousands of hi-definition cameras in the at-risk neighborhoods. But the arrest rate is only 18%.
Because the police have to live in the city, they are (imo) intimidated into silence by the gang leaders... or paid to look the other way.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Edumakated
Those are the talking points that CNN gives them. So that's what they parrot.
Reporters examined the number of marijuana complaints sent through 911 or the city’s 311 help line from predominantly white neighborhoods and predominantly black or Hispanic neighborhoods in New York City. They then compared the number of marijuana arrests in those neighborhoods.
They found that black New Yorkers and, to a lesser degree, Hispanic New Yorkers were more likely to be arrested for marijuana-related offenses than white residents, despite government surveys finding that black and white people use marijuana at similar rates. “Across the city, black people were arrested on low-level marijuana charges at eight times the rate of white, non-Hispanic people over the past three years,” the reporters noted. The Hispanic arrest rate was roughly five times that of whites.
The NYPD has argued that these disparities are the result of people in predominantly black and Hispanic neighborhoods placing more calls about marijuana. But the NYT analysis argues that more calls from these neighborhoods isn’t the cause of the difference. When reporters directly compared black neighborhoods and white neighborhoods with a similar number of complaints about marijuana, they found that far more arrests took place in the black neighborhoods. When arrests did take place in white neighborhoods, they disproportionately affected the small number of black and Hispanic people living in those areas.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Edumakated
I’d say sentencing is pretty well established as having a disparity. BJS commissioned a study that found disparity in sentencing across races. It also indicated a number of potential causes other than racism. But, cops don’t sentence people so it’s an entirely relevant point to the OP.
“Black people are far more harshly treated by police than white people and that’s pretty well established” is a pretty vague statement, and incredibly broad, and I suspect that’s done intentionally.
The bottom line is that the media driven narrative that there’s an epidemic of racially motivated extra-judicial killings by law enforcement is blatantly false. Rather than discuss that, some folks would rather jump on the whataboutism train.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Edumakated
Those are the talking points that CNN gives them. So that's what they parrot.
Actually, I originally got my "talking points" from watching 'war on drugs' documentaries... long before I ever had cable tv.
Reporters examined the number of marijuana complaints sent through 911 or the city’s 311 help line from predominantly white neighborhoods and predominantly black or Hispanic neighborhoods in New York City. They then compared the number of marijuana arrests in those neighborhoods.
They found that black New Yorkers and, to a lesser degree, Hispanic New Yorkers were more likely to be arrested for marijuana-related offenses than white residents, despite government surveys finding that black and white people use marijuana at similar rates. “Across the city, black people were arrested on low-level marijuana charges at eight times the rate of white, non-Hispanic people over the past three years,” the reporters noted. The Hispanic arrest rate was roughly five times that of whites.
The NYPD has argued that these disparities are the result of people in predominantly black and Hispanic neighborhoods placing more calls about marijuana. But the NYT analysis argues that more calls from these neighborhoods isn’t the cause of the difference. When reporters directly compared black neighborhoods and white neighborhoods with a similar number of complaints about marijuana, they found that far more arrests took place in the black neighborhoods. When arrests did take place in white neighborhoods, they disproportionately affected the small number of black and Hispanic people living in those areas.
www.vox.com...
But yeah, I've been brainwashed by CNN... Whatever helps you sleep better at night, mate.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: neo96
Black live only matter when their deaths can fuel a political agenda.
Chicago is proof of that.
Yes. And in Chicago, police know who the shooters are, because of thousands of hi-definition cameras in the at-risk neighborhoods. But the arrest rate is only 18%.
Because the police have to live in the city, they are (imo) intimidated into silence by the gang leaders... or paid to look the other way.
originally posted by: TonyS
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: neo96
Black live only matter when their deaths can fuel a political agenda.
Chicago is proof of that.
Yes. And in Chicago, police know who the shooters are, because of thousands of hi-definition cameras in the at-risk neighborhoods. But the arrest rate is only 18%.
Because the police have to live in the city, they are (imo) intimidated into silence by the gang leaders... or paid to look the other way.
They aren't intimidated into silence...............the gang controlled parts of Chicago are mostly on the south side. It isn't that they are intimidated. Its that they simply don't give a crap. Their job as they see it is to protect the downtown business interests and the corridors traveled by office workers into and out of the DT area.
Can't say I blame them; for every shooter/gang member they arrest, 3 more come in to take their place.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Edumakated
You haven’t had time to read the study I linked to. I’d be interested in seeing the “many” who have debunked the study. The study goes out of its way to include prior history in its data tables.
Furthermore, I point blank said the study points to several factors that are NOT institutional bias as being contributing factors for sentencing disparity. If White Guy gets 36 months for Crime A and Black Guy gets 52 months for Crime A because he has a criminal history, there is still a disparity between their sentences. Just because there’s an explanation for the disparity doesn’t mean no disparity exists.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Edumakated
You haven’t had time to read the study I linked to. I’d be interested in seeing the “many” who have debunked the study. The study goes out of its way to include prior history in its data tables.
Furthermore, I point blank said the study points to several factors that are NOT institutional bias as being contributing factors for sentencing disparity. If White Guy gets 36 months for Crime A and Black Guy gets 52 months for Crime A because he has a criminal history, there is still a disparity between their sentences. Just because there’s an explanation for the disparity doesn’t mean no disparity exists.