SC Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg undergoes lung procedure to remove cancerous growth

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
how could they possibly know there's no more cancer in her? I suspect that this just means they didn't notice anything else when they were cutting out those 2 tumors.

Uh, are you a doctor, or do you have even a modicum of medical training whatsoever?

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Most hospitals have backup generators.

Are you supporting the assassination of a sitting Supreme Court Justice?

a reply to: Xcalibur254

It's your hypothetical. Don't blame it on me.

You guys are actually happy that an elderly woman has cancer?

Yeah kinda having a hard time seeing how y'all gonna be able to claim the moral high ground on this one.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Positron emission tomography scan (PET scan)
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear imaging technique that creates detailed, computerized pictures of organs and tissues inside the body.

A PET scan reveals how the body is functioning and uncovers areas of abnormal metabolic activity.

During a PET scan, the patient is first injected with a glucose (sugar) solution that contains a very small amount of radioactive material. The substance is absorbed by the particular organs or tissues being examined. The patient rests on a table and slides into a large tunnel-shaped scanner. The PET scanner is then able to "see" damaged or cancerous cells where the glucose is being taken up (cancer cells often use more glucose than normal cells) and the rate at which the tumor is using the glucose (which can help determine the tumor grade). The procedure is painless and varies in length, depending on the part of the body that is being evaluated.

A PET scan can be used to detect cancerous tissues and cells in the body that may not always be found through computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

originally posted by: Wayfarer
Yeah kinda having a hard time seeing how y'all gonna be able to claim the moral high ground on this one.

Yeah, I know.

Seeing how leftists have such a moral foundation to stand on.

It's terrible.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
You guys are actually happy that an elderly woman has cancer?

It can't be any worse than gleefully leveraging every murder by firearm to suit your political agenda.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
You guys are actually happy that an elderly woman has cancer?

No. I'm just being realistic. Ginsburg's health is going downhill, fast. I think she's seen her last Hanukkah.

a reply to: DBCowboy

A mole hill is still higher than nothing.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Wayfarer
Yeah kinda having a hard time seeing how y'all gonna be able to claim the moral high ground on this one.

Yeah, I know.

Seeing how leftists have such a moral foundation to stand on.

It's terrible.

If Trump was assassinated tomorrow, most of em would be on here cheering on his death. But don't give a snip about a SCOTUS judge who doesn't give a snip about the Constitution? HORROR!

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: DBCowboy

A mole hill is still higher than nothing.

Give me one good reason why I should even give a single god-damn about a woman who's ideology is in direct opposition to mine.

Why should I even care about anyone who even agrees with me?


Since when did everyone become such emotional dishrags?

originally posted by: BrianFlanders

originally posted by: LordAhriman
You guys are actually happy that an elderly woman has cancer?

It can't be any worse than gleefully leveraging every murder by firearm to suit your political agenda.

Sorry, you can't rebuild a 'no-class-act' on a base of 'whataboutism'. Shame on you!

a reply to: DBCowboy

I didn't say you should. All I said is that the Left have a slight moral ground in this country. Primarily due to their support of universal healthcare. Outside of that the DNC and GOP are near indistinguishable.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: DBCowboy

I didn't say you should. All I said is that the Left have a slight moral ground in this country. Primarily due to their support of universal healthcare. Outside of that the DNC and GOP are near indistinguishable.

Yeah, no.

Left are anti-Constitution, anti-freedom, anti-individuality.

I'm afraid your answer is incorrect so I will have to deduct 5 points from your total score and you lose a turn.


But keep your chin up because; socialism. Or something.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: whywhynot

Technically? Yes. They can keep you "alive" on life support as long as you/insurance are willing to pay.

That said, do you really see the GOP winning in 2024 (assuming Trump wins 2020)?

In a word...YES.

a reply to: xuenchen

This could be fake news. Ruth Ginsburg voted this morning.

theconservativetreehouse.com... l-justices/

a reply to: DBCowboy

Please Professor Snape, don't deduct my points.

I could come up with similar arguments against the Right. The difference is that, in most cases, when the Left wants to violate the Constitution/liberty/freedom their desire is to try and benefit humanity as a whole. On the other hand the Right just want to make money.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

a reply to: xuenchen

OH MY.....

Kinda messed up dude.

And you DB should know better man......