should religion and education be kept seperate?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 4-7-2003 @ 01:10 PM by arc
I'm curious as to what you all think about religious education and practice in schools. Should all schools in Britain and America be biased towards Christianity regardless of the ethnic makeup of their pupils, should schools be a religion free zone or should they teach awareness of all faiths equally?

My personal experience of British schools has been generally non-religious, much like my upbringing at home. At primary school we sang hyms in assembly and learnt the lord's prayer but had very little bible study. My headmistress at middle school was an aethest so instead of religious assemblies we had philosophical and humanitarian readings, and no bible study or any other religious education. At high school RE was optional, assemblies again were non religious and the only year we had any sort of spiritual education was the year before we picked which gcse's we were taking and that subject covered most major religions and also global and moral issues.

I don't feel it's done me any harm - I've grown up to be someone with a keen interest in spiritual matters and a fair amount of tolerance to different views and lifestyles. However if I had been forced down a christian path, I suspect that being the stubborn individual I am, at some point I would have rebelled, losing my innate leaning towards certain beliefsand struggling at some point in my adult life to reconcile those forced teachings with more mature and experience-acquired beliefs.


reply posted on 4-7-2003 @ 02:11 PM by magestica
I think that religion should be kept out of public schools, but not God. But you can't really discuss or teach about God without some sort of religion backing Him up. So then, what do you do? There are many different kids and teachers with many different religions attending schools, so it's unfair to teach about one, and no time to teach about them all..as kids are there to learn about 'other' things first and if they need to learn about religion, then they can go to church, or asks their parents. I'm not against religions and certainly believe in a higher power, but I don't want my child to be brainwashed into some religion while attending school where she should be learning about math and science and other subjects. So it would thouroughly piss me off if she came home discussing God in the Christianity sense or other religion. I don't think kids should be forced to pray either, or forced not to. If she wants to pray then she should be able to, if not then that should be her choice as well.

While I was going to school, we had to say grace before we ate..and if we didn't we would get scolded. Now that I look back on it, I think that it was wrong..I didn't really understand praying and the need for it in school at such a young age therefore I feel as though it was not my choice or my moms choice, it was someone else making the choice for us all and punishing us if we didn't follow through..

There's tons more about how I feel about this, but I'll hold off til others reply..don't want to get ahead of myself here
Magestica



reply posted on 4-7-2003 @ 04:57 PM by CiderGood_HeadacheBad
Having religion tied in with education is unfair and wrong, as the mainstream religion in the country in question will always dominate. Through my own experience of state (public) primary and secondary school in the UK, our education system, in Scotland atleast, is biased towards Christianity.

In primary school, my classmates and I were forced to sing hymns, recite prayers, perform in Christmas plays and attend church for school services. The problem is that primary school teachers seem to enjoy intimidating their pupils, who tend to be about 1/3 their size, and children feel bullied into going along with whatever they are told to. When we were of primary school age, the teachers made us feel so small and weak that nobody ever protested, or refused to attend the Christian services.

Religion should, with the exception of Religious Education encompassing all faiths, be kept out of primary/elementary school, as the children are too young to understand that the choice should be their own as to what faith, if any, they should follow.

At the secondary school I currently attend, and in all Scottish secondary schools, RE is compulsory, although it is only for 1 hour every week. In this class we are taught about the beliefs and practices of most mainstream religions, ie; Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam. The school is still Christian orientated, however assemblies have no religious content and attendance of Christian services at the end of term is optional.

The education of young children, I feel, should be devoid of any religious influence, as they are at an impressionable age, and can easily be manipulated by teachers who want them to follow a certain religion.

The state of secondary education is not perfect, but it is fair, and nobody has Christianity thrust upon them, unlike in primary school.

I wonder, if the practice of, say, Voodoo, or Wiccanism was promoted in state schools, would people stand for it? There would most likely be outcry, so why is it any different from promoting Christianity, in a country like Britain where only around 10% of the population attend church?


reply posted on 4-7-2003 @ 05:34 PM by MrFreeze
Sorry if it has already been said... i just want to reply to the original question first... I haven't read everyones posts... I will do so later...

I think Religion should be separated from any and everything...

Religion is and should be a personal choice.

At the moment religion has it's talons burried deep into everything that concerns this earthly existence. For instance in education and in POLITICS!!! (here in Holland a christian party with christian beliefs are ruling the country) Two examples that religion should be kept out of...

The first one education: controls what we and our decendants learn while we grow up... morals and values, right and wrong, good and bad... Influence by any religion should be prevented from influencing this process. Education should be about life's realities... and things we know to be truthfull and factual. (1+1=2, what goes up must come down, such things)

The second one Politics: Is what rules our lives... makes the laws that we have to live by... Politics is about ruling a country and satisfying the needs and obeying to the will of the public through referenda and open discussion... Influence by any religion should be kept from this process aswell...

I could go on with the media, and so on and so forth... but i think you get my point...

If i chose not to follow the rules of a certain religion (i.e. choose a religion) i should be able to grow up and live accordingly...

Democracy is a lie... we can not choose anything... choices are made for us... believing that your vote (the minority of votes of the few that realise this fact) will influence politicians to do your bidding is ignorant...

We have no freedom untill we seperate religion from processes and institutions which we all have to share with one another. For there are no alternative choices for those institutions processes.

Ah well... let's leave it at that for the moment... i'm beginning to ramble here...

Peace,

MrFreeze

[Edited on 4-7-2003 by MrFreeze]


reply posted on 4-7-2003 @ 06:50 PM by Thomas Crowne
Originally posted by Illmatic67
No, religion should strictly be forbidden in public schools. If parents want their children to learn about religion they should waste $3,500 and send them to a private school.

Even if religion were taught in the public school system it will totally be biased towards Christianity and some Judaism. Jesus this, Jesus that. That's all the children will be hearing. They won't know what Islam is and who Muhammad is until they graduate from the prison of the mind called public school and do some learning of their own.

And I'll say it once and for all. America was not founded on Christian morals. Thomas Jefferson hated Christianity. He hated everything about Christianity, you can't blame him though.


This is the words of a devout anti-Christian who now wants his religion to inherit what the Christian has created.
I have a better idea than the parent "wasting" $3,500 sending their children to a school that will give the child a better education. They should take their tax (that is to say, get a school voucher) so they don't have to pay for their own school as well as the social reengineering instutions that pass for schools now.

Again, you show how much you've been lied to by the NOI. Thomas Jefferson was not anti-Christian, or else he was suffering from multiple personalities, seeing how he was in favor of the Gospel being spread to the Savage (Indian, or more correctly, Native American), and expected every student at the University of Virginia attend worship service of the particular sect (denomination) once a week.

When you don't know the truth, you'll swallow a lie ever time.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why are these 10 figures just like Jesus Christ??
  Posted 7 days ago with 14 member flags
I am an imposter in Church
  Posted 6 days ago with 11 member flags
What Kind of Christianity Is This?
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Great Flood Was Caused By A Comet?
  Posted 13 days ago with 7 member flags
Advert claiming cure through prayer is banned
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
The real Jewish people. Torah Jews Against ZIONISM
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
The World Is in Desperate Need of Heretics!
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags