posted on Sep, 16 2018 @ 04:42 AM
I appologize for not watching the video but I'm pressed for time. One thing which seems to have been neglected to be explained is how an aluminum
plane made an exact imprint/cutout of the solid steel/glass exoskeleton, pass through 2-3 steel rebar reinforced concrete floors complete with thick
steel vertical and horizontal I beams, and then out the other side of the outer wall, still retaining the wing and fuselage shape. Talk about a
marvel of modern engineering (the aluminum alloy used in the 25 year old plane).
I get so upset when people say that this happened due to the speed of the plane, which lets be generous and say 600mph which translates to 880 feet
per second. which is about the speed my good BB/pellet gun shot as a kid and a VERY slow handgun cartridge.
Had the plane hit that building it would have disintegrated into millions of pieces and it would NOT have cut the outer shell the way it appeared to
have let alone pass through floors and out the other side. The glass alone would be enough to destroy the plane, glass is incredibly strong, tough
and more dense than aluminum. All the physics, ALL that has been told to us, is complete BS.
I just don't understand the people who don't see it, is it willful blindness, or do they support it because "the ends justify the means" type thing?
If a war is inevitable and one side refuses to see that it is coming, is it wrong to accept the "official" story if it was originally created to wake
the sleeping masses - b/c otherwise we'd have a phantom/invisible insurrection/war on our hands by an enemy that is claiming peace but is slowly
strangling us. So is it wrong to deny 9/11 if it was allowed to happen to awaken a sleeping public to the clear and present danger that was brewing?