Weiner laptop: 700k+ emails and backups to all the destroyed blackberrys

a reply to: EartOccupant

I was getting the liberal response out so we can talk about the huge news story. Now that we are past it we can have rational discussion.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Splash one more.

🚬🔫

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

That is the problem.. we get lost in details, departments, specialists, jurisdiction, is: b#sh+t

Every wake human being, whatever their political, sexual, animanial, plantinal, bacterial or atomical being does experience a strange tingeling with the "official" explanations of ALL extraordinary happenings on earth after 1937.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
I just hope they've kept the chain of custody on the laptop pristine, unlike what happened with Hillary's server.

If the FBI didnt I am sure the NYPD did. From what I have read they have all of the files in question also.

a reply to: Xcathdra

I've read that as well.. about two years ago..

Don't get me wrong,.. but getting impatient.
I understand to take down a cabal you need an infrastructure.... but damn...

a reply to: EartOccupant

They are not as clueless as we believe. I think they knew the trouble their plan would be in if they allowed her to ascend to the throne. It would have been too much against the will of the majority at that time. They play the long game and another 10-15 years isn't a problem for them. It is better to delay than to rebuild from scratch.

They gave us trump as an appeasement. They are probably giving us the illusion of regaining a portion of our freedoms while they allow our public education to further erode our ability of critical thought.

What type of time frame are you lovers of political entertainment allowing before you actually see results, or finally realize this is all a dog and pony show? Just another month? Just another year? Just until the next election?

At some point don't you have to stand up, wipe the grit from your eyes and say 'wait a minute'?

Couldn't say it any better Joe.

a reply to: ClovenSky

Mhhhh Briljant post to spark my mind out of num.

Gotta hard time though to infill the void, al be it smiling (mostley)

a reply to: EartOccupant

But I guess we will be called the clueless. We don't ra ra ra for one side and believe in this complete BS that is the political soap opera.

I devoted my time and energy in the not too recent past trying to understand this stuff. How it appeared the laws are only meant for the unconnected, the unpowerful and the unwealthy. They never seemed to touch the political class. Maybe they got fined one or two percent of the total booty amount they took in by illegal means, but no jail time. They were never punished by the means they use on us sheep. I witnessed this year of year. Election after election. I got excited when my 'team' won but nothing ever changed. I got more and more stressed. More and more upset and angry. What the hell was going on here?

Then I realized this system is working exactly as designed. They were all in on it. They are all actors. How it must drive these politicians insane not to be recognized for their powers of make believe. But they are rewarded in other ways, power and money. They are the protected class and will just have to make due with the secret knowledge of their greatness. Even though politicians are temps in the grand scheme of things, the illusion that we can make a change by altering them is still powerful.

Even those that see the 2 party system as being a gigantic fraud don't want to go this far in vilifying the entire establishment. As long as there is some form of hope out there, this system will continue. They stuck terror into our bones with socialists/marxists dictators and then try to appear like we have a choice with a semi capitalist emperor.

When people realize this entire structure is a soap opera creation and the people on camera don't really matter in the grand plan, then we can start changing our reality. As long as there is hope, we are #ed.

a reply to: ClovenSky

I Agree.

How do we act and accomplish on the pavement of the opera?

a reply to: EartOccupant

Pavement pizza, with a good opera and a nice glass of Chianti?

a reply to: LightSpeedDriver

It views the Le beaujolais nouveau ou primeur in another light.

a reply to: EartOccupant

I am not entirely sure but I have a suspicion. What do they all want? They never elude to the system being corrupt, but only one side of the system as being bad. They encourage us to reform the system. They encourage us to vote for change. To make campaign finance reforms. To get us involved because our involvement gives this system meaning.

What are they most afraid of? Apathy. You see apathy as the ultimate sin. If people realize this entire system is corrupt and we will never change it by reform, then we will have the power to change this pile of #.

The first step is acceptance. Acceptance that this system is working exactly as designed. The people that fill these political positions are the exact type of psychopaths that are required.

We have been trying to change this system for how long now? Has it gotten any better or have our freedoms simply eroded year after year?

When we change ourselves and stop worrying about this gigantic cluster, we will finally have the power to change this system.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Remarkably, McCabe, Comey, Priestap, Strzok,and then Mary McCord at DOJ have little recollection of much of this at all. It just kind of “fell off the radar.” They were “busy.” it was probably “duplicates,” and their focus was on the “Russia” investigation to which they gave priority. And after all, they did not expect any information on the laptop to “change the outcome of the case.”

In other words, they didn't want to die.

originally posted by: Rosinitiate

Couldn't say it any better Joe.

What? pot calling the kettle black?

a reply to: ClovenSky
a reply to: ClovenSky

I hear what you're saying, trust me. There is a very definite and specific reason I chose the username I did here.

This time?

Well, it looks like things actually are happening.

Many folk who have been part of the problem won't be for the first time in a long time.

The FBI and DOJ leadership under the most recent administration has been placed under a microscope and what's wriggling out isn't pretty. Can you imagine what the Law Enforcement Sensitive and complete unmodified Chapter 13 portions of the OIG report look like?

Huber and his team have been very, very busy; tens of thousands of sealed filings are a very strong indication that that is the case.

It will be interesting to see Strzok's dance in front of the committee.

Strzok was escorted out of FBI headquarters and then had his security clearance revoked. Peter is a little fish, relatively speaking, though.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I've been thinking mid-year for a couple of months now. By June we should see a shift in public focus of investigations and perhaps some of those who were demoted or have been forced to step down be named in indictments; Strzok, the Ohrs, Page, perhaps even McCabe.

It's obvious that the DOJ and FBI need a thorough scouring; politically appointed bureaucrats have a lot more sway than they should in how these agencies operated.

By the end of the year we might be looking to see something come from the Awans, DWS, or maybe even Huma.

There could be more (unexpected) retirements if things get serious; think Pelosi, Schumer, McCain (of course, his health might get him before then anyway), and/or plenty of others if we really get down to brass tacks.

If something like this time frame doesn't play out then I'm shifting more with you in thinking that the whole Q thing was staged as a coverup/distraction whilst skeletons were relocated by the uni-party.

I know that's 4 months away at the earliest, but this is federal government we're talking about and we know how glacial they are with change.

The above exchange was in February, in April:

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has issued a criminal referral to the U.S. Attorney's Office in D.C. related to fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, a lawyer for McCabe confirmed on Thursday.

Justice Dept inspector asks US attorney to consider criminal charges for McCabe - The Hill

McCabe is a bit bigger fish.

By what's been presented in the OP, Huma Abedin is in some serious trouble. Wonder if she'll fall on the sword or throw someone else under the bus?

Abedin is an even bigger fish.

See where I'm going with this?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

I guess we are going into (H)uber space and its gonna be a ride.

With all due respect.

a reply to: EartOccupant
a reply to: EartOccupant

Check the dates on both those news pieces I posted. McCabe's criminal referral and McCord's leaving the DOJ were announced at the same time.

I'm sure it is just a coincidence.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

If these politicians/aids had committed 1/10th of these transgressions 100 years ago, they would be swinging from lamp posts for treason. Where are the prison sentences and not some low level person getting paid handsomely for taking a fall? Where are the rico laws that will strip said politician of ALL their wealth and not just a meager fine pretending to resemble a slap on the wrist?

What happens to us sheep if we are suspected of profiting from an illegal activity? gram of green stuff on the floor mat of a car? Seize the car and anything in it making it impossible to retrieve after it is taken.

I will believe this isn't a soap opera when someone of actual import in this show goes to jail or has their entire wealth confiscated for racketeering. The only problem with that is if one of them goes down, they all go down. They stand shoulder to shoulder even on different sides of the isle.

Have you established a time frame of this change? Are you willing to give it another year? 10 years? 15 years? In 2010 after the fed and politicians basically made all of the banks whole again after they brought this country to its knees and no one was sent to jail, I gave myself 4 years for true reform. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. We are probably back to where we were in 2007 if not bigger. 2014 came and went and nada. nothing. zilch. I will not be a willing participant to this mirage anymore.

How much longer will you give it?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

All hyperbolic of-course, but could you imagine in a universe far away they would entertain the thought that some participants got an opt out for the "greater" good?