It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Active Shooter at the DOJ??? ...appears to be a false alarm

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: RalagaNarHallas
Perhaps it was a way to keep people out of the facility while traitors dressed as regular police smuggled out any and all evidence incriminating about the investigation Into Doj for destruction off site.




posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 05:12 PM
link   
a reply to: RalagaNarHallas




posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 05:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: RalagaNarHallas
Perhaps it was a way to keep people out of the facility while traitors dressed as regular police smuggled out any and all evidence incriminating about the investigation Into Doj for destruction off site.


Hey wait that sounds like a conspiracy 💥🎃



posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 05:35 PM
link   
a reply to: worldstarcountry

it would really be weird if real events unfolded in the way the false alarm was reported.



posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mandroid7
God that buzz word annoys me.

I don't know what it is.

It's like double drama, or the opposite of a double negative.



I'd be curious to know what an "inactive shooter" looks like.
Full of holes courtesy of the police?



posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 06:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Asktheanimals

originally posted by: Mandroid7
God that buzz word annoys me.

I don't know what it is.

It's like double drama, or the opposite of a double negative.



I'd be curious to know what an "inactive shooter" looks like.
Full of holes courtesy of the police?


Sitting in a chair at the entryway yelling about how everyone is gonna get theirs as soon as he gets out of said chair...



posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen
Well, if the story fits. I guess they trying to figure out how to explain why a third-party even called it in and under what circumstances so people do not ask what was whisked away from the site while the public was not watching.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join