Here Are The Questions that Bob Mueller Wants President Trump to Answer.

April 30, 2018

You'll find the questions in the New York Times article. Too many to do a copy/paste here. The opening paragraph:

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, recently provided President Trump’s lawyers a list of questions he wants answered in an interview. The New York Times obtained the list; here are the questions, along with the context and significance of each. The questions fall into categories based on four broad subjects. They are not quoted verbatim, and some were condensed.

NYT Article Containing The Questions: www.nytimes.com...

Some of those are designed to be a TRAP!

This is one instance where President Trump should do like Hillary did with questions that a Federal judge forced her to answer in 2016. Of the 27 questions, she answered 20 of them with, "I do not recall".

Source: www.politico.com...


-CareWeMust

a reply to: carewemust


This has been talked about lately on talk radio... the goal is to charge Trump with obstruction.

Doesn't matter what his answers are..... charge him with obstruction.

a reply to: carewemust

the fact that this was made public tells all we need to know
mueller has no actual case and is begging for public opinion
mueller has shown his incompetence and should be removed

originally posted by: carewemust
April 30, 2018

You'll find the questions in the New York Times article. Too many to do a copy/paste here. The opening paragraph:

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, recently provided President Trump’s lawyers a list of questions he wants answered in an interview. The New York Times obtained the list; here are the questions, along with the context and significance of each. The questions fall into categories based on four broad subjects. They are not quoted verbatim, and some were condensed.

NYT Article Containing The Questions: www.nytimes.com...

Some of those are designed to be a TRAP!

This is one instance where President Trump should do like Hillary did with questions that a Federal judge forced her to answer in 2016. Of the 27 questions, she answered 20 of them with, "I do not recall".

Source: www.politico.com...

-CareWeMust

Trap?

Seem like perfectly reasonable questions to me.

If he's as clean as you all insist he must be, he'll have no trouble at all answering them. He should be fired up wanting to answer them, he's the one insisting this thing should end soon.

Unfortunately for Trump, those questions pertain solely to obstruction charges. It's been well-reported that Mueller's team is divided into "Possible Crimes Committed While in Office" - the "Obstruction" crimes in this questionaire, the "Possible Crimes Committed Prior to Taking Office" - the financial ties to Russia which go back years and do not require questions as to Trump's state of mind, and then the third "Other" - which has been the source of a great deal of speculation.

As a progressive liberal redneck southerner, I can assure you that from all that I have read on liberal blogs, Mueller's reports will be definitive. If he finds no evidence of collusion or obstruction, end of story. If he does ... then it gets complicated. But, people do trust the lifelong Republican with 45 years of experience prosecuting crimes.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: carewemust

the fact that this was made public tells all we need to know
mueller has no actual case and is begging for public opinion
mueller has shown his incompetence and should be removed

Shown his "incompetence"?

I think he's shown very little other than securing the guilty pleas needed, running the investigation and doing his job.

Scuttling it beforehand is the act of the guilty.

a reply to: carewemust

Yea, I don't think Trump could get through that line of questioning even with prior knowledge of the meeting.

I think at some point he'd go off the cuff. He doesn't have that politician poise or the benefit of being protected like the rest of Washington.

All I've seen in the past decades is blatant disregard for laws and ethics. But I haven't really seen anyone pay for that.

So let us just believe that the NY times came across the questions. Did the steal them? Found on a grassy knoll perhaps.

Obviously they were leaked.

So ... who leaked them and why.

I understood that it was illegal to leak this level of data.

Oh, I see ... another dog and pony show for the masses.

Mueller leaks live a sieve.

P

a reply to: Scrubdog

leaking the questions to the press taints the investigation
it is the act of a desperate partisan unable to gather anything tangible
mieller has lost all credibility

oh and in case you forgot in the usa it is innocent until proven guilty not tried in the press

a reply to: Scrubdog

As a progressive liberal redneck southerner, I can assure you that from all that I have read on liberal blogs, Mueller's reports will be definitive. If he finds no evidence of collusion or obstruction, end of story. If he does ... then it gets complicated. But, people do trust the lifelong Republican with 45 years of experience prosecuting crimes.

Of course that's what those blogs are going to say. They're going to say what people want to hear. And the media will peddle any dramatic story for ratings.

As always, if someone is guilty, let the cards fall where they may.

But as for this story, it's been 500+ days and has only served as a distraction.

Don't worry about Syria everyone, don't mind that Israelis have targeted Iranians directly twice in the past month. (for the first time in history FYI).

Trust your media and the stories. Because they never drag us into unnecessary war. Both sides want it, and both sides will get it.

a reply to: Scrubdog

If Priebus told Mueller that Trump asked him to fire Sessions, but Trump tells Mueller that he didn't, Trump is brought up on some kind of charge. Priebus will be given the benefit of the doubt. That's how you trap someone.

a reply to: infolurker

I vividly remember turning on the car radio one afternoon in the mid 90's and hearing S.C. Ken Star recommending that President Clinton be impeached for lying about sex. I recall the investigation starting out as looking at some kind of land deal. I was thinking WTF?

Mostly BAIT questions.

This could be a stunt "leak".

Little miss Muffet she sat on her tuffet...

Now what?

😎

a reply to: carewemust

How'd this just get leaked to the public? Transparency or did someone obtain it?

Why would Trump validate a witch hunt by answering questions? His rights are violated everyday the special counsel remains active.

a reply to: pheonix358

On the other hand, the people who feel that Bob Mueller is working with Trump, see this "leak" as a diversion. Lots of red meat for the media to chew on...thinking that Mueller is working really hard to get this President who hurts their feelings on a daily basis.

CNN and MSNBC can be pre-occupied with these questions and porn stars for days, while Mueller and the Inspector General continue to build their evidence against the Obama administration.

a reply to: carewemust

This is just more proof that Rosenstein is
part of the problem. He should be investigating
these leaks, even if they are not real.

I contend once again Mueller and his SC investigation
is in fact "the insurance policy".

SC Mueller is "the case" that Strzok needed
to open up while Andy was in office.

a reply to: xuenchen

After re-reading the evidence that Mueller and the OIG investigating Obama Admin crimes, are working together, I tend to agree. These questions were intentionally leaked by Mueller to a gullible/stupid New York Times.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

After re-reading the evidence that Mueller and the OIG investigating Obama Admin crimes, are working together, I tend to agree. These questions were intentionally leaked by Mueller to a gullible/stupid New York Times.

They might be setting up the "Kaboom Broom"

originally posted by: ItsNotIronic
Why would Trump validate a witch hunt by answering questions? His rights are violated everyday the special counsel remains active.

The Special Counsel can compel the President to Answer. A good many though can be answered with "I don't recall", just like Hillary did. You can learn things, even from professional criminals.

I can answer all of them on behalf of any sane person.

On the advice of my attorney I decline to answer any questions.

End of story.