It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
I fully agree. I'm not the one saying we are witnessing evolution in bacteria and plants, etc.
originally posted by: gimcrackery
Even Darwin thought his theory should be taken with a grain of salt.
reply to: wildespace
originally posted by: AdKiller
If you cant look passed blood and bone filled examples of growth on earth, evolution is just right for you!
We all came from soil. What is dirt and sands common ancestor? Rock? How did rock evolve? Who cares about reptilians and mammals. How did plants evolve their responses to natural stimuli, without a brain or nervous system? Why does a Venus fly trap spit out what it can't eat? Not how, but WHY? Wouldn't it be the path of least resistance to just not exist?
The path of least resistance.. Is unadulterated unlimited speed and movement. We are an electric Bi-verse. Things cannot evolve in this system, only revert to what they once were.. As resistance against omnipresent omnipotent dynamic life fluctuates throughout the dynamic galaxy.
The human conciousness has been manipulated by this fluctuating resistance to life, to embrace stagnation, while promoting change. The feel good message of Luciferianism, that stillness is somehow synonamous with creation and peace, that the speed of Gravity defines our creator...
originally posted by: wildespace
I accept the theory of evolution, and strongly advocate for it, but something's been bugging me recently about the graphical depiction of the evolutionary trees
originally posted by: jjkenobi
What bugs me about Evolution is that now everything is in a natural state of decay. But somehow for a long time everything was getting better and improving drastically.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Teikiatsu
So nothing with apples, snakes and ribs?
No, but I believe there is some design involved in the process.
originally posted by: randyvs
originally posted by: CharlesT
I think the most evident proof of evolution would probably be found in the mutations witnessed in bacterial strains as they become increasingly resistant to antibiotics. Wouldn't you call that process evolution? Take TB for instance, it is becoming ever more resistant to antibiotics over time.
A broader vocabulary would gravitate more to the word adaptation.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: burgerbuddy
No you are correct. AS evolution says nothing about how life started, God or Gods, could be involved. That is one option.
I've never seen a graphic depicting direct species to species evolution.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: burgerbuddy
Nope I am a polytheist, therefore I believe in many Gods.
I accept the theory of evolution, and strongly advocate for it, but something's been bugging me recently about the graphical depiction of the evolutionary trees: prehistoric species are shown as descending from a common ancestor, but the actual common ancestor is never shown.