-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account-

a reply to: dashen

Read the article I posted and think about the damage done already.

Also, you look kinda obsessed given how you deal with different opinions. Which is probably why the alt universe needs me here, mocking this whole fascist mindset of yours.

I mean... you're at a point where you're willing to 'decipher' ATS user names for the sake of 'your' narrative. Go and figure?

Also certain topics seem to get the most derailment.
.

. Such as Gannett news service
Such as rizvi Traverse.
Such as Frank guistra.
Such as Bill priestap.
Such as funny blue triangles

a reply to: dashen

I read the Q threads but must admit I am not entirely convinced.

However, it is ridiculous to try to derail this thread in such a way.

This does seem to happen on both sides here on ATS though.

Oh well, back on topic now.

a reply to: PublicOpinion

Your attempt to dissuade us from reason logical questioning and research is duly noted.
.

.
.
Thank you for your great contribution

Future proves past...
Breadcrumbs posted days in advance...eyes in a sector of interest look.

Findings concur the breadcrumbs to look deeper.
The deeper we dig the more info comes to light.
An entire web a whole network of conspirators lie before us.

The most substantial thing I've seen with my own eyes is that never before in my history did I see the executive branch summon human traffickers to answer for their crimes. The issue has always been masked.

2018 will be the year reality set-in.

No more toying around under the guise of charity.

To be perfectly clear. I do not condone doxxing or posting other information of any kind that is not obtained by legal means. I post only what is public knowlege and can be accessed without any restrictions. Every source and link is freely accessible and i always provide them as well. So please let us get back to topic.

Wait what was the topic?

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
To be perfectly clear. I do not condone doxxing or posting other information of any kind that is not obtained by legal means. I post only what is public knowlege and can be accessed without any restrictions. Every source and link is freely accessible and i always provide them as well. So please let us get back to topic.

Wait what was the topic?

something about logical researchers who eat breadcrumbs and dive down rabbit holes?

a reply to: fiverx313

I think you need bread crumbs when you're cooking a rabbit for hasenpfeffer

originally posted by: PublicOpinion

originally posted by: MountainLaurel
LOL.....ok I will try and do my due diligence as one of the "bored housewives" and report on what's said on the View today with the interview with Michael Wolff.

Whoopie begins the show insulting Trumps televised bi-partisan meeting yesterday on DACA, they show a clip of him saying "let's work together and do this with Love" WTH do these people want ? ok, the interview is beginning now

I'll be back !

That was well deserved but... what?

A report on an opinion regarding a bunch of opinions someone sold in a hyped up book?



Geez. And you can't see how and why this is likely a political stunt? All I see is Trump in a Templar armor on a horse, must be the wrong ytube clip though.

I did watch the interview you posted and I actually think it's worth watching and worthy of consideration, some of the points the guest makes that stood out.

1. Q-anon is a very sophisticated operation.
2. Some of the linguistics and grammar suggest it could be written by AI or people whom English is not thier 1st language.
3. Controlled opposition of alternative media, keep the troublemakers busy researching
4. a brilliant marketing strategy designed to possibly direct web use or to mine information
5. a feel good alternative to "doom porn" he calls "hope porn" lol, a term you seem to have added to your vocabulary

He goes on to say that he doesn't outright dismiss Q based on the accurate predictions and sophistication of the operation, he also warns against some of the things I listed and to apply critical thinking. Did I sum that up pretty accurately ?

As for watching the interview on the View with Michael Wolff, it's worth watching because it gives me insight on the narrative of a book that is being highly debated in MSM, gives insight into Bannon and it was mentioned by Q , along with strange typo's in the book. Truth be told I wouldn't have watched the show had it not been for this interview, lol, heck I could only bring myself to watch highlights of the golden globes, I'm not that bored !

Many of us have given our reasons for participating in this thread and I don't think I can express it any better then they have. We are dealing with some complex and heart wrenching realities with as much Heart, knowledge and humor as we can, we're not brain washed dummies...and what's so bad about HOPE...best kind of porn if you ask me.

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: Denoli

Assange been granted EQUADORIAN PASSPORT.

Not to fast to celebrate just yet. this looks like a sensualized click bait article.

Julian Assange has been granted an Ecuadorian passport just a day after threating to kick him out of its London embassy, it has been claimed .

The Wikileaks founder Julian Assange posted a picture of himself wearing an Ecuador football shirt an hour ago, adding to the speculation he had been granted citizenship

So doesn't appear to be official yet, just more speculations

Then again this might have some legs to it?

google translate eluniverso

Diario El Universo (Spanish for "The Universe") is one of the largest daily newspapers in Ecuador. It was founded in 1921 and the first edition was published September 16 of the same year. Its headquarters are located in Guayaquil.

According to the Universo

The director of Wikileaks Julian Assange now has a certificate of Ecuadorian citizenship, with a code corresponding to the province of Pichincha Archive

Reliable sources confirmed that the document number granted by the Ecuadorian civil registry to Assange is 1729926483 and that a passport had already been issued to him. It appears with the condition of "Inscrip.As400", term with which late inscriptions are identified, for which an old database was used.

This is easily reconfirmed also on the website of the Internal Revenue Service , where it appears that the number corresponds to Julian Paul Assange. It is noted that so far "the citizen / taxpayer has no information registered in the SRI database or reported by third parties."

The delivery of the identity document as Assange Ecuadorian occurred, according to records, on December 21, 2017 , in volume 46, page 327, with diplomatic and political authorities of a new government, that of Lenin Moreno, in office since May of 2017.

Then it gets weird again?

The Foreign Ministry issued a statement in which it did not mention the delivery of the citizenship card and assured that "it will not respond to rumors or distorted or decontextualized information about this case."

Official statement translated


Translated statement:
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility of Ecuador, in relation to the situation of citizen Julian Assange, reports:

Julian Assange obtained international protection in August 2012 from the Ecuadorian Government at the time. The current Government has been responsible for finding alternatives to resolve this inherited situation, with full respect for the national legal framework, international law and human rights.

With regard to this case, the national government has complied with the Constitution, international conventions and the law, acting with the prudence and caution that warrants the protection of human rights and the defense of the right of asylum.

The Foreign Ministry reiterates that in the case of citizen Julian Assange will continue to seek solutions, in strict adherence to the norms and procedures of international law, in coordination with the United Kingdom, a country with which the best relations of friendship and cooperation are maintained.

Julian Assange, at the request of the Government of Ecuador, undertook not to intervene in matters unrelated to his asylum status.

Finally, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility of Ecuador reiterates that it will not respond to rumors or distorted or decontextualized information on this case

a reply to: DJW001

What you don't think Republicans are part of the Swamp too? I don't think anyone here has ever stated otherwise. The Establishment is a bipartisan thing.

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: Denoli

Assange been granted EQUADORIAN PASSPORT.

Not to fast to celebrate just yet. this looks like a sensualized click bait article.

Julian Assange has been granted an Ecuadorian passport just a day after threating to kick him out of its London embassy, it has been claimed .

The Wikileaks founder Julian Assange posted a picture of himself wearing an Ecuador football shirt an hour ago, adding to the speculation he had been granted citizenship

So doesn't appear to be official yet, just more speculations

Its just him having a pic with him in the EQUADOR home shirt that gives me the thumbs up .

a reply to: Martin75

That's their intention, isn't it. This is what they do as the pieces we put together begin to form the Big Picture. When you get too close for comfort, the distracters kick it in high gear.

Introvert keeps begging for someone to "tell everyone the entire story that is going on behind the scenes".

Over and over, he has done that. And there are always those few posters that think they have to respond to him and the others tit for tat.

This thread is valuable, and if those who are sincerely trying to find answers to reveal the deep seated corruption that has been taking place over many years want to continue, it is best to not get into spitting matches with the people that want to get this thread shut down.

PLEASE....We all know the board rules. Let's continue this important research and sharing of it and avoid the distractions by those naysayers and trolls. PLEASE.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: pavil

If Q were trashing Trump, you'd be all aboard the Q Train.

Wrong. PublicOpinion and I have a history of disagreeing politically. What we do share, however, is a dislike for [HOAX!]es. Q makes vague predictions and its followers try to fit facts to them in retrospect, while ignoring failures and contradictions. That is how fake psychics have always worked. This thread belongs in the "Grey Area," if not [HOAX!]

You disagree. Fine. Move on to something you are really interested in. You haven't devoted any effort into researching anything. There is a lot of wrong actions that have happened, we have researched such things here. To say it's all a hoax is to not look at the shady things we see going on. Is 100% of Q things right, probably not. Hell we can't even decipher some of the "crumbs". I do know that once you starting looking, you find odd connections and weird occurrences that make you look even further.

a reply to: MountainLaurel



Limited hangout, controlled opposition and all those terms come to mind as well. Yes, you've got it. Thanks for your feedback!

Many of us have given our reasons for participating in this thread and I don't think I can express it any better then they have. We are dealing with some complex and heart wrenching realities with as much Heart, knowledge and humor as we can, we're not brain washed dummies...and what's so bad about HOPE...best kind of porn if you ask me.

Emotions are being used to sell narratives with, keeping us occupied with half-truths and disinfo. That's the "bad" hope-porn right there. Fear-porn isn't really effective anymore and thus hope is being instrumentalized to sway the public.
That's a very thought provoking approach in my book and worth to consider.

a reply to: Greenblaz

This fustercluck all started after we went back to Loop Capital.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Huma and Anthony Weiner have called off their divorce Page Six.

Would any laws regarding married persons not able to be compelled to testify against each other apply to Huma and Anthony?

ok, here's my take of the View interview with Michael Wolff.
Basically I didn't learn much that was new , but here are the highlights.

Wolff begins by making the claim that 100% of everyone he interviewed claims Trump is "erratic", Joy and I think Whoopie chime in at least 4-5 times to say "unstable" , Wolff seems reluctant to use that word however. They then go on to discuss the DACA meeting which they speculate is his way to show himself acting sane, LOL, because of course everyone knows he's "unstable" ! Now even if he was acting sane at the meeting he was still un-prepared and passed the buck to the committee, what ?! He's holding a bi-partisan meeting , public transparency and directing a committee to work together to solve a complex problem, how could that be a bad thing ? Anyways they finish this 1st segment by discussing claims in his book that Trump repeats stories and has memory loss......hmmmmm well maybe if you're talking to 100's of people everyday you might repeat a story or forget something, IDK....maybe it's a good story

Ok, next segment they discuss Bannon and the fact that's he's been fired as a direct result of this book, the audience cheers and one of the ladies chimes in that he deserves a "Peace Prize" , they go on too discuss that the WH was seperated into 3 camps.
1. "Jar-Vanka" I had never heard that one, I didn't quite get what he meant other then that maybe Bannon thought their influence was too "liberal"? Jared's dealings are something we've been looking at, so who knows?
2. Bannon's differences with Trump, again things we've been speculating about ?
3. Previous administration, I guess that meant people left in WH that worked under Obama
They finish up the segment, he also claims the media's criticism of his book is because he "scooped the story" and that Trump's reaction and threat to stop the book helped sales, woo-hoo, book #1 on Amazon, audience cheers !

a reply to: Ameilia

Ding ding bing Bing

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Greenblaz

This fustercluck all started after we went back to Loop Capital.

And we still need to keep digging in that topic. There's still something big I think that we haven't figured out.

Growing in 3 months to over 500 Million? Who did thst and what strings or favors were pulled?

When people get scared of people digging for more facts you know you have hit a nerve.