It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Vegas shooting survivor, California charity co-founder dies suddenly

page: 3
41
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 07:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Epilepsy doesn't tend to kill people, as far as I know.



People with epilepsy are at an increased risk of death. This increase is between 1.6 and 4.1 fold greater than that of the general population and is often related to: the underlying cause of the seizures, status epilepticus, suicide, trauma, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Source


Increased risk, perhaps, but she contradicted official reports, and dies within days of this event? Seems like a big coincidence, and I don't believe in those. Knew someone some years back who was epileptic, and quite elderly, too.

This is suspicious, with everything else odd about the case.




posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 07:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: opethPA

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Epilepsy doesn't tend to kill people, as far as I know. At her age? Very suspicious.

I don't know what to think, on this one, but it's odd.


Except the article doesn't claim she died from epilepsy..so


Exactly, and we aren't told why she died. It's like they toss that in a a possible reason, without naming it as one, so people don't question anything. Far too much weird here.



posted on Oct, 19 2017 @ 06:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Increased risk, perhaps, but she contradicted official reports, and dies within days of this event? Seems like a big coincidence, and I don't believe in those. Knew someone some years back who was epileptic, and quite elderly, too.

This is suspicious, with everything else odd about the case.


Juts adding that it can lead to complications and death. Not saying that was the cause but it is a distinct possibility.



posted on Nov, 5 2017 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Increased risk, perhaps, but she contradicted official reports, and dies within days of this event? Seems like a big coincidence, and I don't believe in those. Knew someone some years back who was epileptic, and quite elderly, too.

This is suspicious, with everything else odd about the case.


Juts adding that it can lead to complications and death. Not saying that was the cause but it is a distinct possibility.


Seems a very slim possibility, and the timing, you have to admit, is very suspect. Right after she starts contradicting official reports, she just happens to die from a condition that isn't typically fatal?

I know if I was a witness to this event, I'd be watching my back!



posted on Nov, 5 2017 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Seems a very slim possibility, and the timing, you have to admit, is very suspect.


Actually, I wouldn't. Not unless the autopsy produced some unusual findings.



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Seems a very slim possibility, and the timing, you have to admit, is very suspect.


Actually, I wouldn't. Not unless the autopsy produced some unusual findings.


If this was a hit of some sort, to cover up something, do you really think they couldn't easily control autopsy results? Anyone who could plan, and conceal said plans, an event like this could manage that as well.



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 01:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
If this was a hit of some sort, to cover up something, do you really think they couldn't easily control autopsy results? Anyone who could plan, and conceal said plans, an event like this could manage that as well.


Too many moving parts, even Kennedy's autopsy photos came out.



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 06:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
If this was a hit of some sort, to cover up something, do you really think they couldn't easily control autopsy results? Anyone who could plan, and conceal said plans, an event like this could manage that as well.


Too many moving parts, even Kennedy's autopsy photos came out.


Perhaps. But not likely to see them for some average citizen, so how would we know? I won't say she was killed, because there isn't any proof, but I do wonder. Now, id other witnesses started vanishing, too....



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Too many suspicious deaths after the Vegas shooting. This is deliberate. She was probably murdered.



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
But not likely to see them for some average citizen, so how would we know?



The California Public Records Act (PRA), Government Code Sections 6250 to 6270, requires the Santa Clara County Medical Examiner-Coroner’s Office to make public records available for inspection by the public and to provide copies upon request. Source



posted on Nov, 7 2017 @ 01:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
But not likely to see them for some average citizen, so how would we know?



The California Public Records Act (PRA), Government Code Sections 6250 to 6270, requires the Santa Clara County Medical Examiner-Coroner’s Office to make public records available for inspection by the public and to provide copies upon request. Source


Well, that's something, at any rate. Doesn't prove it would be accurate, but something. Still, we now have a couple who survived, who were killed in a bizarre car crash, with a massive fire. Coincidence?



posted on Nov, 7 2017 @ 02:39 AM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

BS, BS, BS, BS

For what its worth I once had a pituitary tumor myself which was taken out 40 years ago.

Not once, Not Once !!!!!!!, never, never, never did any specialist, or general practitioner talk to me about the risk of sudden death caused by this tumor no matter how likely, unlikely or remote, the risk. IT NEVER GOT MENTIONED. If sudden death was even a remote possible no matter how remote, they would have mentioned it to me because doctors here are not hamstrung like they seem to be in the US.

From start to finish (near on 2 years) I was seen by several specialists, several general practitioners and one nuro surgeon. Some within and some external to the hospital system.

I know exactly what illness they are talking about when they mention "even benign pituitary tumors can cause significant health problems because of their location near the brain and because many of them secrete excess hormones.

The illness they are referring to is EXACTLY what i had. The effects of my tumor was visible on my body, that's how they can tell a person may have it, and after looking very carefully at the picture of this girl, I see absolutely no signs whatever of this illness in her.

BS, BS, BS, I say absolutely




edit on 7-11-2017 by Azureblue because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-11-2017 by Azureblue because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2017 @ 07:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Well, that's something, at any rate. Doesn't prove it would be accurate, but something. Still, we now have a couple who survived, who were killed in a bizarre car crash, with a massive fire. Coincidence?


I personally would want to see what the accident report says.




top topics



 
41
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join