It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Michael Morell admits no evidence of Trump Russia collusion.

page: 1
11

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 11:11 AM
link   
Former acting CIA director, Michael Morell, a Clinton ally, admits no evidence of Trump Russia collusion. He endorsed Clinton and called Trump a dupe of Russia. Even he admits there is 0 evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia. As he describes, smoke, no fire. In the election Trump says he respects Putin and Putin respects him, but that does not amount to collusion between Trump and Russia.

www.nbcnews.com...





posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 11:18 AM
link   
Isn't NBC fake news though?



posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 11:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: RomeByFire
Isn't NBC fake news though?

Yup.
FAKE NEWS.
FAKE NEWS.
FAKE NEWS.

Wow, that actually does feel pretty good.



posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

What Morrell had said about Trump during the election was that he was an unwitting agent of Putin, in other words, that Putin was manipulating him. I don't know that he's "admitting" any sort of fault in his own statements.

What he's saying now is that he hasn't seen any evidence that Trump staffers colluded with Russian operatives so in his opinion, it's all smoke and no fire. It's been 3-4 years since he was with the CIA but as former deputy director and acting director and an intelligence analyst now, I'm sure he has good sources.

I hope he's right. I already feel much better with Flynn out. It's unfortunate that it took a leak to the press exposing that the administration had lied about Flynn or that Flynn had lied to the administration (whichever you choose to believe) to pressure the President into canning him.



posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye



Former acting CIA director, Michael Morell, a Clinton ally, admits no evidence of Trump Russia collusion.


No. He says he hasn't seen any evidence. Not that it doesn't exist. As well, James Clapper says they didn't include any evidence of collusion in their report, and when questioned further, he said they didn't include the "Dossier" because they hadn't validated or corroborated the testimony within it. He said that he didn't know the content of the conversations between Trump Campaign staffers and the Russians. That's a big question, right there!

He also said that the Committee should be able to better investigate issues than he, because they should have access to ALL the intelligence, all of which he did not have.



edit on 17-3-2017 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 11:35 AM
link   
A huge amount of people are going to be disappointed in the next two weeks but Trump supporters will rejoice and bask in the glory of dems destroying each other to avoid jail time. You have seen nothing yet. I also expect a mass exodus from different sides after everything is revealed. The whole world will be watching when all the so-called democrats crash and burn.

"We are all going to hang when that bastard wins". Famous words from Hillary and now it will come to pass. Unfortuneatly Hillary or Obama will not be charged with anything at least in Obama case it could lead to a civil war.

The next weeks are gonna be epic. There is also another rumour that Vault 7 is going to release Alien disclosure files on April the 3rd. Interesting times we live in that's for sure.



posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Flynn is a problematic man. Obama appointed him then fired him. Trump should have been careful not hiring Flynn in the first place.



posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 11:41 AM
link   
a reply to: windword

All the "evidence" is classified material anyway.




posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Correct. And if there is evidence of Trump Russia collusion, they didn't release it before January 20, 2017 to stop Trump from becoming president. It's not important whether there is evidence or not, what's important is what do they do with the evidence if it exists.
edit on 17-3-2017 by allsee4eye because: (no reason given)







 
11

log in

join