It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You talk as though these non-discrimination laws all of a sudden make it legal for a man to rape someone in the women's room.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: kaylaluv
Why? Lets ban cars. That would save a hell of a lot more lives than banning guns would. If you really care about children that is...
originally posted by: MysticPearl
originally posted by: PageLC14
a reply to: fandancego
Now that's not a bad idea at all
Yes it is.
To hell with my tax dollars going to funding new bathrooms for every Tom, Dick and Harry who identifies themselves as something new.
So let me ask you this: until now, why have we had separate restrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms, etc, ? If both genders can occupy the same facilities with no issues regardless of their identity or sexual orientation or choice of clothing, why have we had separate facilities for so many years? And, whatever those reasons were, why do they suddenly mean nothing?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Vroomfondel
Like I said, it's not about bathrooms, just like it wasn't about water fountains. It's about making sure a selected group know that it is less than everyone else.
All you have to do is wait for the stall to be available
originally posted by: snowspirit
And I don't want a manly looking trans male in the women's bathroom, because THAT is exactly what opens up for men testing to see if they can also get away with being in women's restrooms.
Some guy walking down the street decides one day he thinks he is a woman and wants to use the girls restroom.