posted on Jun, 26 2003 @ 04:20 AM
Well the affirmative definately has it much easier.
After all, we all picked on people before because they'd not fight back, it's called bullying, and it's impossible for the "masonic elite" to
ever fight back.
Well I think Xaos (since the debate is over no harm in commenting right?), should have lead his attack with pointing out some actual real masonic
elite.
Such as the British royal family. Obviously not forerunners in the field of Satanism.
The current Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of England is the Duke of Kent, the cousin to the queen.
It would be Prince Charles but he has yet to join.
However, I can't think if the Duke of Kent is the protector of all masonry, or if someone else in the royal line is...either way, these are truly a,
if not THE back bone of Masonic "elite" if there is really such a thing.
As the UGLoE is the GL all other GLs try to be recognized by.
The Duke of Kent is a Master Mason, the appending bodies such as the 33rd degree of the Scottish rite, are virtually non-existant outside the US, and
hardly has anything to do with actual Freemasonry.
Oh well, just a few words on a facinating subject, good work both of you guys.