It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
Disruptive passengers on commercial airlines don't automatically warrant fighter escorts. Also the diversion and the subsequent ground positioning of the flight at Stanstead might suggest that initial reports indicated a higher threat level than what is normally termed as disruptive passenger behaviour
The precautions taken in this instance seem to indicate that he true nature of the situation was not properly established until after an alert level call had been received.
Essex Police later said the plane had been diverted because a man wanted by the Metropolitan Police was on board.
However, Pakistan International Airlines said in a statement that UK authorities had received "some vague security threat through an anonymous phone call" regarding the flight
Stansted is a designated airport for dealing with hijacks and major security alerts.
Such incidents are dealt with in a remote part of the airfield to the north-west of the terminal building.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: alldaylong
According to your link the plane landed at 1450 and the police are saying it was due to a disruptive passenger and at this stage they do not believe it to be related to a hijacking attempt or terrorism.
originally posted by: grainofsand
I always wonder what the jets would actually do, shoot the airliner down over densly populated south east England?
So it's standard SOP to scramble jets to escort passenger airliners over just a disruptive passenger?
originally posted by: grainofsand
Sorry OP veering off topic
originally posted by: neo96
So it's standard SOP to scramble jets to escort passenger airliners over just a disruptive passenger?
Oct 28, 2016
The RAF has scrambled fighter jets to escort a passenger plane to an airport in Scotland after it lost communication with the ground.
5 August 2014
Military jets were called to escort a passenger plane to Manchester Airport today after airline crew received a hoax bomb threat.
3 May 2016
Sonic booms shook houses and rattled windows in Yorkshire on Monday night as two RAF Typhoon jets scrambled to escort a passenger aeroplane in to land.
8 APR 2016
The RAF said quick reaction alert Typhoon aircraft were launched from RAF Coningsby to identify an unresponsive civilian aircraft
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: neo96
So it's standard SOP to scramble jets to escort passenger airliners over just a disruptive passenger?
Let us see...
Oct 28, 2016
The RAF has scrambled fighter jets to escort a passenger plane to an airport in Scotland after it lost communication with the ground.
5 August 2014
Military jets were called to escort a passenger plane to Manchester Airport today after airline crew received a hoax bomb threat.
3 May 2016
Sonic booms shook houses and rattled windows in Yorkshire on Monday night as two RAF Typhoon jets scrambled to escort a passenger aeroplane in to land.
8 APR 2016
The RAF said quick reaction alert Typhoon aircraft were launched from RAF Coningsby to identify an unresponsive civilian aircraft
So it is not uncommon
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: neo96
So it's standard SOP to scramble jets to escort passenger airliners over just a disruptive passenger?
Happens often.
Standstead is set up to receive these kinds of planes where there has been some kind of disruption I think i am correct in saying Glasgow Gatwick is also set up for it. Each incident is risk assessed depending on the situation, its not uncommon for the police to be arresting someone off a flight for being "disruptive". I would guess that given the origin of this flight they risk assessed that a fighter escort would be appropriate.
In this case it seems to have just been some guy going nuts on the plane and not a attempted hijacking or terrorist attack.