It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

U.S. Distrct Judge Slams DOJ on conduct in Federal Amnesty case

page: 1
9

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 01:24 AM
link   
Breitbart Texas reported in May of 2016 that U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen slammed U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officials, writing that their “conduct is certainly not worthy of any department whose name includes the word ‘Justice’.” He added, “Suffice it to say, the citizens of all fifty states, their counsel, the affected aliens and the judiciary all deserve better.” He opined that the DOJ “purports to represent all Americans—not just those who are in favor of whatever actions the Department is seeking to prosecute or defend. The end result never justifies misconduct.” Hanen issued a 28-page memorandum opinion and order and lambasted federal government officials for misleading the Court during the executive amnesty litigation.



www.breitbart.com...


Affidavit :



www.scribd.com...



Personally, I've been waiting on this for a while.
The involved attorneys have been legally barred from appearing in Judge Hanen's court for life.

Buck



edit on 24-1-2017 by flatbush71 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 10:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: flatbush71

The involved attorneys have been legally barred from appearing in Judge Hanen's court for life.



That will look great on their résumés.




posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 10:42 AM
link   
a reply to: flatbush71

Hilarious bit of reportage.

I read the whole thing, and was still baffled about what, PRECISELY had been done wrong, by specifically whom, and when. I know someone was misled, but as to who was responsible, precisely what they got wrong, and what the context is?

Not a dickie bird. Its just not in the piece. Shoddy writing on the authors part.



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 11:46 AM
link   
Sounds like the DOJ received the harshest penalty for a government agency that commits perjury: a sternly worded letter.

I wish I could lie in court and only face a 22 page letter from the judge expressing his disapproval of my conduct.




top topics
 
9

log in

join