It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: skyblueworld
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, same rule applies to the UFO phenomenon. I've never seen one single shred of evidence of the paranormal that could hold up in a court of law.
Just fyi. A court of law accepts anecdotal evidence as legit evidence. Science doesn't. It's likely that there IS UFO evidence that would hold up in a court of law.
originally posted by: jamespond
a reply to: 808Funk
If I can have my own two cents worth.
For some people the mere though of some subjects, such as (but not limited to) the paranormal, can create heightened levels of anxiety. This can lead to sleepless nights hiding under the bed covers in a cold sweat wondering if the bogey man is really going to jump out of the wardrobe to get them.
So to put themselves at ease these people will regularly reassure each other that it's all just crazy stories being made up by people with nothing better to do than try to fool everyone that the world is not a black and white than they've been made to believe.
Look what's happening in America today, Donald Trump is president.
How do you spot the true stories and confirm their authenticity?
originally posted by: jamespond
a reply to: humphreysjim
You'll have to define what you mean by real proof. I think for some people the only time they would believe a UFO sighting was real would be if the government confirmed it. Well this is never going to happen so those said people are basically accepting a lie while at the same time dismissing something that they couldn't possibly gauge the credibility of.
It's a sad state of affairs when witness testimonies are deemed adequate for our court systems but are dismissed outright when it comes to UFO or paranormal sightings. Are we saying we shouldn't believe anyone no matter how credible the witness when it comes to subjects that are deemed outside the box? Even in cases where military personnel have witnessed such things or in the case where a craft was recorded in Turkey, giving actual video evidence of Aliens?
You talk about fantasy, but aren't some of the explanations given to discredit those who speak up about the UFO phenomenon just as much fantasy as the topics in hand? Swamp gas anyone?
You can't demand real proof but at the same time dismiss everything and anyone on gut feelings. While there are plenty of fakers around these subjects I feel they're generally easy to spot if you do the proper research.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: skyblueworld
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, same rule applies to the UFO phenomenon. I've never seen one single shred of evidence of the paranormal that could hold up in a court of law.
Just fyi. A court of law accepts anecdotal evidence as legit evidence. Science doesn't. It's likely that there IS UFO evidence that would hold up in a court of law.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: humphreysjim
Look what's happening in America today, Donald Trump is president.
You just lost credibilty bringing Trump into your discussion. You do realize that people chose to vote for whoever they like?
I suspect you would rather a scientific ruling class with life long tenure and nepotism.
originally posted by: jamespond
a reply to: humphreysjim
You'll have to define what you mean by real proof. I think for some people the only time they would believe a UFO sighting was real would be if the government confirmed it. Well this is never going to happen so those said people are basically accepting a lie while at the same time dismissing something that they couldn't possibly gauge the credibility of.
It's a sad state of affairs when witness testimonies are deemed adequate for our court systems but are dismissed outright when it comes to UFO or paranormal sightings. Are we saying we shouldn't believe anyone no matter how credible the witness when it comes to subjects that are deemed outside the box? Even in cases where military personnel have witnessed such things or in the case where a craft was recorded in Turkey, giving actual video evidence of Aliens?
You talk about fantasy, but aren't some of the explanations given to discredit those who speak up about the UFO phenomenon just as much fantasy as the topics in hand? Swamp gas anyone?
You can't demand real proof but at the same time dismiss everything and anyone on gut feelings. While there are plenty of fakers around these subjects I feel they're generally easy to spot if you do the proper research.
originally posted by: 808Funk
Youtube is either fake, bollocks or easily explained but if a skeptic hasn't had an experience then why are they hell bent on proving your wrong ?
originally posted by: underwerks
Most people won't believe something until they see it in front of them. Even then, a lot of people don't want to believe it.
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: 808Funk
Been reading a bit on various Skeptics like James Randi, Joe nickels, Micheal Shermer etc and from my view a lot of them come over as aggressive tunnel visioned "I'm right your wrong" type's in which you find you get in certain religious, argumentative, ideology and political types.I know a lot of the stuff out there in reports, book's, internet and film, Youtube is either fake, bollocks or easily explained but if a skeptic hasn't had an experience then why are they hell bent on proving your wrong ?
Personal experiences are not evidence of paranormal activity being real. Human beings are influenced by all sort of factors, such as their own mental perceptions and confirmation bias.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: 808Funk
Youtube is either fake, bollocks or easily explained but if a skeptic hasn't had an experience then why are they hell bent on proving your wrong ?
Yes, as previously indicated, a good skeptic would actually be pleased as can be if something "paranormal" actually turned out to be an new gateway into a whole new branch of science. But it has to be logically proven with good evidence. Big changes in the status quo require solid proof, and not just a lot of blind belief and wishful thinking.