It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Profusion
I can't believe my eyes.
Live Presidential Forecast
The New Times is giving Trump a 95% chance to win the election. Meanwhile, they're projecting Clinton to win the popular vote by about 1%.
This goes against everything that I heard about this election. Every pundit I heard was saying that Trump would have to win the popular vote in a landslide to win the election.
What does this mean for the supposed rigged voting machines theory?
originally posted by: Profusion
I can't believe my eyes.
Live Presidential Forecast
The New Times is giving Trump a 95% chance to win the election. Meanwhile, they're projecting Clinton to win the popular vote by about 1%.
This goes against everything that I heard about this election. Every pundit I heard was saying that Trump would have to win the popular vote in a landslide to win the election.
What does this mean for the supposed rigged voting machines theory?
originally posted by: LumenImagoDei
If Trump wins then he was selected not by us but by the people behind the curtains. He is one of them, the media dogging him is reverse psychology. They know people are sick of the establishment so they made someone part of the establishment seem like an outsider when he's really part of the inner circle.