It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

F-22, F-35 Outsmart Test Ranges, AWACS

page: 4
6
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: seagull

It went black.


Or it became self aware and fled


If/When then can share all of this data seamlessly to the legacy fleet, it would be a huge force multiplier for the Navy and A/F




posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 05:02 PM
link   
And people thought i was playing when i brought up via funny narrative how clever and smart "D.U.D.E." AI system really was. 😈



posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 06:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Crumbles
a reply to: Zaphod58

The real picture on the runway is the f-19? Looks completely different from artist conception.


No the second one (on the runway) is the YF-23.

It was the jet that lost vs the F-22.


or did they lose in reality? maybe we just done see them being employed.



posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 06:40 PM
link   
a reply to: FredT

Air boss: return to base tin man.
AI: I dont wanna!! Youll just yell at me again!
Air boss: all right i promise not to yell at you again ok?
AI: Ok..sniff.... and can i have soem of that tasty green fuel too?
Air BOss: sure thing. just hurry on back and land before anyone sees you.
AI: YAYYY!!!

Imagine teaching a AI flight system like a child an dthis isnt so far fetched.



posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 06:45 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

It lost. The only examples built are in museums. No others were built.



posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Oh im sure something must have come out of the f23 program.......



posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: yuppa

It lost. The only examples built are in museums. No others were built.


such a waste. why not use them to boost the fleet of f-22?



posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR

Nope. One of those that didn't really have a place to fit in, both mission and money wise.



posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Money.



posted on Nov, 9 2016 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Well that would certainly explain why I can't find those in the store around here any more...

They're stealthy doritos. That never even occurred to me.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 02:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: yuppa

It lost. The only examples built are in museums. No others were built.


But when it comes to talking about classified information you cannot be a credible source. You by law cannot reveal certain information you are obligated to protect because you gave your word you would.

I'm not saying you're lying.

Sure, maybe the examples of the "YF-23" are in museums.
But they could have built a dozen "F-23"s, which are somewhat different than the "YF-23".
They could be stationed somewhere secret in Alaska or where-ever.

Heck, depending on the amount of secret info you do know, it could exist and you don't even know about it.
I realize you are very adept at giving the official story though, which is valuable.

But I know you know a few secrets, and you know I like to throw stuff around for fun to see if I can make you uncomfortable and also to make you laugh about it. I know over the last few years I've hit a nerve somewhere, at least once. The odds are in favor of it, I'm not completely ignorant. For example, I'm easily in the top 1% (or even .1%) of the general population when it comes to recognizing aircraft or any flying objects and identifying them and relating information about them. I'm certainly not a professional expert, but I'm an amateur expert almost definitely.

I know I revealed a secret somewhere in this forum, and I know you know it.
And something about that just is very enjoyable to me, I can't say I understand it.
I'm probably really crazy, but I'm not a good judge on determining that rationally.
edit on 11/10/2016 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 06:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: FredT

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: seagull

It went black.


Or it became self aware and fled


If/When then can share all of this data seamlessly to the legacy fleet, it would be a huge force multiplier for the Navy and A/F



I believe it's also being applied outside of aviation to assist in answering some of the "big questions"...



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 09:42 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

In this case, I'm not bound by anything. I have no NDA about anything related to the YF-23. I have several sources that, if it existed, would know and would tell me. I'm sure NG wanted to use it to fill several roles that opened up, but it just didn't fit well.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 12:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Michet

originally posted by: FredT

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: seagull

It went black.


Or it became self aware and fled


If/When then can share all of this data seamlessly to the legacy fleet, it would be a huge force multiplier for the Navy and A/F



I believe it's also being applied outside of aviation to assist in answering some of the "big questions"...



The answer is 42.



posted on Nov, 10 2016 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa



They strike again!







 
6
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join