It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

2016 ELECTION RESULTS

page: 77
137
<< 74  75  76    78  79  80 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

Clinton is the one who does not want freedom of religion.

Right. Because calling for a total ban of Muslims coming into the country is advocating freedom to practice religion here.




posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   
216/202




posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   
Local news is calling Clinton in MI, even though Trump is ahead in the actually numbers. figures.


BTW. JIN and Nat. Beers for the both of you. Before the snow flies.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   
BBc was totally up to speed, now its stopped dead with trump on 172, it's currently showing Clinton winning 190-172 lol



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   
California for Clinton. 0 surprises.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   


I only see faces like this at sporting events.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   
CNN got Clinton 190/171 over Trump.

Fox got Trump 216/202 over Clinton.


Might stick with Fox or be left behind.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: kruphix

I don't see HRC doing as great as she may think in Detroit.



HRC lost a lot of the Black Church support that Obama had. I have seen some reports from Detroit and the numbers are not at all like Obama's at this point allow she will no doubt carry Detroit and a few surrounding counties.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: stosh64
Florida for Trump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I am holding the emotion in because its not over yet, but it's hard to do.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
NYT now reporting >95% chance



For what??



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
Get ready to see NYT's percentage shift with California.

Their algorithm for that percentage is horrible.


HA. It went up to 95%>, after California was factored in. WOW.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   
lol people leaving Hilary victory convention apparently!

Although as results come in they start cheering! oh yeah California... BBC laughs at them...

Not done yet but the tables have now turned officially Clinton now has the narrow path!



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   
a reply to: chiefsmom



Before the snow flies.


I've been very kind to you, why the need to cuss at me!!


They may be counting the D in for HRC.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: BlueAjah

Clinton is the one who does not want freedom of religion.

Right. Because calling for a total ban of Muslims coming into the country is advocating freedom to practice religion here.


Are the Muslims who are already here being told not to practice? If not, then how are they not free to practice their religion?



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   
With CA and a few other states called, Fox has:
Trump: 216
Clinton: 202



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker

originally posted by: UKTruth
NYT now reporting >95% chance



For what??


To win Presidency



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:03 PM
link   
It would be a dream come true if Trump says on his winning speech to Hillary, "You're fired!"



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
CNN got Clinton 190/171 over Trump.

Fox got Trump 216/202 over Clinton.


Might stick with Fox or be left behind.


Saw that! They can't bring themselves to face the actual numbers. Poor CNN. LMAO.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:03 PM
link   
I will be very interested to see if the 19% holds for African-Americans-or goes higher.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
Get ready to see NYT's percentage shift with California.

Their algorithm for that percentage is horrible.


You are incorrect, they had factored California in. They also factor in which precincts have reported, and which have yet to do. All night almost every percentage they have had for every has moved further towards Donald as the night went on.

I feel like the underestimated the rural vote, and as such have had to adjust all night as the precincts have came in.







 
137
<< 74  75  76    78  79  80 >>

log in

join