It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Confidential auditor's report states that Clinton Foundation is engaging in illegal conduct

page: 1
30

log in

join
share:
+7 more 
posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 06:46 PM
link   
Here we see a Podesta email that has an attachment that is a report about the Clinton Foundation.

It uncovers some illegal activities and some incompetence.

Big surprise.

No wonder the CF is under multiple investigations.

You have to dig deep for the attachment.

podesta-emails/emailid/49561

Confidential auditor's report states that Clinton Foundation is engaging in illegal conduct

MEMORANDUM TO BRUCE LINDSEY

FROM: KUMIKI GIBSON
DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2008
RE: LEGAL AND HUMAN RESOURCES REVIEW & ASSESSMENT: REPORT OF INITIAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS





posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 06:49 PM
link   
Lol, the US gubment is engaging in illegal activity. Remember the presiders and minions are just fall guys (and gals).

They can take it. Heap it on... two days to go.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Nov. 6 -
"Clinton aide says Foundation paid for Chelsea’s wedding, WikiLeaks emails show"

Fox Source

New York Post Source

Breaking 911 Source

Take your pick on the sources, they are all the same.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 08:29 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

The fact that this email was dated 2008 AND NOTHING WAS DONE TO CORRECT THESE ISSUES is crazy.

Hillary was a top lawyer and so good at her job that she convinced a judge to give a 2 month sentence to a pedophile because the child "wanted to be raped".

Here is the OP from Soulwaxer:


Here is a story about a 12-year-old rape victim. She was raped by a 41-year-old man who had Hillary Clinton as his defence lawyer. This man beat and raped a virgin 12-year-old resulting in a 5-day coma, months of rehabilitation, 10 years of therapy, and never able to have children. (see her thrashed body in the video). Hillary used every trick in the book to get the rapist off, for example: - The girl was into older men. (at 12 years old...) - She had rape fantasies. (at 12 years old...) The rape apparently wasn't humiliating enough to the girl. She got him off with only 2 months in a county jail. Then bragged and laughed about it (audio in the video).


She was a top lawyer so how could she let legal issues within The Clinton Foundation go unresolved?

My guess is that she knew that the Clinton Foundation was immune to persecution, they were stuck in a web with other high profile leaders and judges lining each other's pockets with a gentleman's understanding that if one went down they all would. They wouldn't knowingly continue to flout legal requirements unless they had a strong sense of immunity
edit on 6-11-2016 by Kalixi because: corrected spelling error



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 03:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kalixi
a reply to: xuenchen

The fact that this email was dated 2008 AND NOTHING WAS DONE TO CORRECT THESE ISSUES is crazy.

Hillary was a top lawyer and so good at her job that she convinced a judge to give a 2 month sentence to a pedophile because the child "wanted to be raped".

Here is the OP from Soulwaxer:


Here is a story about a 12-year-old rape victim. She was raped by a 41-year-old man who had Hillary Clinton as his defence lawyer. This man beat and raped a virgin 12-year-old resulting in a 5-day coma, months of rehabilitation, 10 years of therapy, and never able to have children. (see her thrashed body in the video). Hillary used every trick in the book to get the rapist off, for example: - The girl was into older men. (at 12 years old...) - She had rape fantasies. (at 12 years old...) The rape apparently wasn't humiliating enough to the girl. She got him off with only 2 months in a county jail. Then bragged and laughed about it (audio in the video).


She was a top lawyer so how could she let legal issues within The Clinton Foundation go unresolved?

My guess is that she knew that the Clinton Foundation was immune to persecution, they were stuck in a web with other high profile leaders and judges lining each other's pockets with a gentleman's understanding that if one went down they all would. They wouldn't knowingly continue to flout legal requirements unless they had a strong sense of immunity


Lawyers have a job to represent their client to the best of their ability. They can not only be disbarred, but they can also be prosecuted for obstruction of justice for not doing so.



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

honestly, why should they bother to worry about "legal" issues. LOL, who's going to reprimand them? the DOJ? Bwahahahahaha!!!

Just do what ever you want Clintons, it's all good. The stupid public hasn't a clue and even if they did, it's not like they can do anything right? Enjoy your cake, and every now and then, throw a little at the old ladies in the front row. They like the frosting when they are allowed to grab a bit. Perhaps there is a bit of Chelsea's wedding cake left?



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 09:51 AM
link   
Take a look at email 54598... that's written by Cheryl Mills and in the attachment she litterally writes that the foundation is structured to:



to support him in the following activities:

Personal activity (friends, family, household, finances);
Political activity (campaign, national party, state party, political fundraising);
For-profit activity (paid speeches, books, advisory consulting services);
Non-profit activity (Clinton Foundation and affiliated entities; other non-profits);
Former President official activity (U.S. and foreign governments).


That's pretty fancy for a type of organisation that isn't allowed to be used for private benefit if it has to remain under tax excemption AND... how can they write on their website that they are a non political organisation as well as Bill and Chelsea not receiving any money for being there?


Heck... this mail along should tank the damn thing!
edit on 7/11/16 by flice because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Given your track record of anti- Democrat stories, I have to laugh at this story from a twitter 'tweet'.

No actual evidence, just more of the same rhetoric.



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Look in other charities like the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, and I am pretty sure you will find corruption too.



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: xuenchen

Given your track record of anti- Democrat stories, I have to laugh at this story from a twitter 'tweet'.

No actual evidence, just more of the same rhetoric.


Nobody has claimed the original email and report is false.

Did you actually read the report?

I know it's a difficult question.




posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:22 AM
link   
I just checked the foundations report from 2012, same year as the Cheryl Mills email... they filed the foundation as excempt from taxes.... yet this collides with the Mills mail.

Someone has to make IRS aware... or somebody. They are committing tax fraud.
edit on 7/11/16 by flice because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:28 AM
link   
a reply to: flice

The IRS is already looking very closely at the CF:


The local branch of the IRS' Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division is reviewing the tax status of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.


The Dallas IRS Office That's Quietly Determining the Fate of the Clinton Foundation



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: IsntLifeFunny

Lawyers have a job to represent their client to the best of their ability. They can not only be disbarred, but they can also be prosecuted for obstruction of justice for not doing so.

You make a great point. It was a tough/unpopular case yet Hillary delivered big time for her client. I try not to judge her for that.

Obviously Hillary is a well educated/top notch lawyer. When motivated she performs flawlessly/expertly. She's a professional driven to achieve so I'm not surprised she used her skills to defend a pedophile. Unfortunately the Hillary who became SOS was a very different person.

How does a professional like Hillary go from top notch lawyer to an ignorant/careless/cloth wiping SOS??? She couldn't follow simple procedure, her claim that a personal server would make life easier is total BS based on the chaos/confusion that ensued. She admits it wasn't easier, quite the opposite, said it was a mistake.

Had Hillary performed so carelessly, made so many "mistakes" when defending the pedo, he would've gone to prison for life. Funny how she follows procedure to the letter in one area and not so much in another.

Apparently the higher Hillary climbs the ladder, the lazier/less professional/productive she becomes. She's not worth the risk to voters/taxpayers. Frankly it's embarrassing and suspect watching such a highly educated woman feign ignorance.
edit on 11-7-2016 by Morningglory because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 01:07 PM
link   
looks like we'll be resurrecting the Clinton indictment threads pretty soon.




top topics



 
30

log in

join