It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Assange: WikiLeaks did not receive Clinton emails from Russia

page: 1
38
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+19 more 
posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 08:52 AM
link   


In a John Pilger Special, to be exclusively broadcast by RT on Saturday courtesy of Dartmouth Films, whistleblower Julian Assange categorically denied that the troves of US Democratic Party and Clinton work and staff emails released this year have come from the Russian government.

“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster as part of a 25-minute John Pilger Special, courtesy of Dartmouth Films.

“Hillary Clinton is just one person. I actually feel quite sorry for Hillary Clinton as a person, because I see someone who is eaten alive by their ambitions, tormented literally to the point where they become sick – for example faint – as a result of going on, and going with their ambitions. But she represents a whole network of people, and a whole network of relationships with particular states.”

Assange: WikiLeaks did not receive Clinton emails from Russia

What I find most interesting about this article is his equivocation with McCarthy era politics...
While I technically disagree with the parallel, I understand why he would make it from a foreign perspective...

But more so I find it fascinating that he mentions a "network of people", a 'cabal' to be more accurate, behind the Hillary machine...
A group of people who have found a wildly ambitious person who will blow with whatever winds can take her into power…
A person easily bent to your will if you have her requisite "approval", which in Hillary's case is money money money...

Hillary Clinton is the ultimate candidate for the elite our brokers of the world…
She is a person with no moral compass and an unfathomable ambition paired with a proclivity for lying regardless of the publics outrage at her obvious falsehoods, fictionsand mischaracterizations...

Furthermore Hillary's insulation from criticism by a fawning media desperate to see another progressive pet group(women in this case) drive our country further into an unrecognizable leftist hell hole Who long since surrendered the moral high ground once fully occupied by the light of the west, America...

Long live the Infallible Queen....and don't forget, Russia did it

-Chris




posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:00 AM
link   
What I find most interesting, is that there were people that believed her.

Maybe the Russians made Bill do the bad things he does too.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:03 AM
link   
nice one,,,,Hillary trolls activate.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:10 AM
link   
Ah, the news of Russian non-involvement brought to you by the official Russian mouthpiece. Luckily there's no conflict of interest there.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: beeeyotch
nice one,,,,Hillary trolls activate.


Assange mentions Mcarthy era politics and says a network of people and nations are behind her....
He has access to her emails and undoubtedly has information backing up his claims...

How is commenting on truth considered "trolling"?

I would bet my house that during the Bush administration you called criticism of the president "patriotism" and not "trolling"...

Hillary is a woman with no moral compass…
She takes money from despots and powerbrokers of unfathomable evil without so much as a blink of an eye...
Heck, the man she chose to spend her life with is a serial rapist who predates upon women as a lion up on zebras..

I realize your religion of progressivism makes you blind to anything your Infallible Queen could do wrong but open your eyes…she's an amoral narcissist and proves it almost weekly…

Water is wet.
The sky is blue.
Hillary Clinton has no morals.

-Chris



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:14 AM
link   
a reply to: paraphi

Provide evidence for this accusation please.

Spreading demonising anti-Russian propaganda and slandering an anti-corruption, pro-transparency activist isn't particularly helpful to anything.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:15 AM
link   
Russia has no reason to harm Hillary. They are 10 steps ahead of Obama and Hillary on every move. Pretty much the best thing to happen to Russia politically in a long time. Trump on the other hand is a greasy stick of dynamite.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: LifeMode

10 steps ahead yet almost completely dry economically. Nice try.

Edit. Oh Hillary and Obama. Thought that said as a country. You're right.
edit on 3-11-2016 by Crumbles because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:27 AM
link   
Most of the real experts (that are not employed by the Clinton campaign) say that the leaks must be coming from within Washington. And really, you don't need to be a genius to figure out that it's most likely Democrats who don't like Hillary (ie, former Sanders supporters), who are working to undermine Hillary and her minions.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Most of the real experts (that are not employed by the Clinton campaign) say that the leaks must be coming from within Washington. And really, you don't need to be a genius to figure out that it's most likely Democrats who don't like Hillary (ie, former Sanders supporters), who are working to undermine Hillary and her minions.


Hell, it's probably the FBI and intelligence services leaking to WikiLeaks, then they turn around and support the it's Russia Hillary screams to make her look even more foolish.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

So Assange will be on a Russian state sponsored news program telling us that it DEFINITELY wasn't Russia that sent him those files? And you don't see any room for bias in any of that?



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Most of the real experts (that are not employed by the Clinton campaign) say that the leaks must be coming from within Washington. And really, you don't need to be a genius to figure out that it's most likely Democrats who don't like Hillary (ie, former Sanders supporters), who are working to undermine Hillary and her minions.

Who are these "real experts" exactly? Right wing bloggers?



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Not like the USA is gonna give him any airtime?



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Well, if any of it's true, it's basic tactics to couch it as derived from questionable sources. And using the Red Scare has historically worked on Americans. Kind of diabolically genius, really.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: LifeMode
Russia has no reason to harm Hillary. They are 10 steps ahead of Obama and Hillary on every move. Pretty much the best thing to happen to Russia politically in a long time. Trump on the other hand is a greasy stick of dynamite.

if HRC:
WWWIII()
else:
random()



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: GreenGunther
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Not like the USA is gonna give him any airtime?

So that suddenly makes this broadcast credible or something?



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Well, if any of it's true, it's basic tactics to couch it as derived from questionable sources. And using the Red Scare has historically worked on Americans. Kind of diabolically genius, really.

Then why isn't any 3rd party countries that aren't Russia or the US sponsoring a program to highlight this?



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I'm just saying it's genius if the Clinton camp floated the Russian thing to undermine the authenticity. It's worked so far.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Nope, just saying beggars can't be choosers.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t




So Assange will be on a Russian state sponsored news program telling us that it DEFINITELY wasn't Russia that sent him those files? And you don't see any room for bias in any of that?


You think because RT is one of the networks that bought and will be airing an independent interview that it means the interview is bias?

The interview was done by Dartmouth Films for ITV. But don't let that ruin your conspiracy theory.



new topics

top topics



 
38
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join