Revealed: 2010 Video Shows Hillary Clinton Lecturing SD Employees on Cyber Security

The video completely proves she blatantly lied about not knowing the State Dept. security protocols regarding email security.

a reply to: FuggleHop

Hillary Clinton is an elitist, lying hypocrite who can go to hell.


(but I won't say how I really feel)

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The video completely proves she blatantly lied about knowing the State Dept. security protocols regarding email security.

Does it?

Because all she said in the video is to be vigilant about cyber security.

How does that prove anything?

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The video completely proves she blatantly lied about knowing the State Dept. security protocols regarding email security.

Does it?

Because all she said in the video is to be vigilant about cyber security.

How does that prove anything?

LOL. What does be vigilant mean? Not what Hillary did.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: xuenchen
So she gives these lectures and then all the top officials go ahead and use her unsecured email system.

Huma, Donna, Jake and the whole gang of international pirates.

LOL...maybe they all missed seeing the video.

I bet the video was sent out to all their emails too !!

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The video completely proves she blatantly lied about knowing the State Dept. security protocols regarding email security.

Does it?

Because all she said in the video is to be vigilant about cyber security.

How does that prove anything?

The video comes with handy captions too.
"...as State Department employees, we have a special duty to guard ourselves and our sensitive information."

Awkwarrrrrd!

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: IAMTAT

That is freaking hillarious.

Kind of hard for her defenders to defend.
Still...I'd love to hear how this isn't HRC hypocrisy taken to a new kind of 'Stupid' level.

What is there to defend?

You are right, there's nothing there for them to defend, except her lies and deceptions.

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The video completely proves she blatantly lied about knowing the State Dept. security protocols regarding email security.

Does it?

Because all she said in the video is to be vigilant about cyber security.

How does that prove anything?

It proves she told her underlings they were supposed to do it, but didn't do it herself.
You know, that whole "lead by example" sort of thing...?
... or maybe you don't....

originally posted by: paradoxious

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: IAMTAT

That is freaking hillarious.

Kind of hard for her defenders to defend.
Still...I'd love to hear how this isn't HRC hypocrisy taken to a new kind of 'Stupid' level.

What is there to defend?

You are right, there's nothing there for them to defend, except her lies and deceptions.

...Don't forget her outstanding elitist hypocrisy!

"be vigilant about cyber security" How can she lecture others on that topic when I seem to remember reading that she didn`t sign up for nor did she attend any of the state department classes on cyber security. Wouldn`t part of being vigilant about cyber security include attending the state department classes on cyber security?

She must've 'forgot' she lectured everyone in the State Dept. about guarding their "sensitive information".

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The video completely proves she blatantly lied about knowing the State Dept. security protocols regarding email security.

Does it?

Because all she said in the video is to be vigilant about cyber security.

How does that prove anything?

She has provided no records of her and her staff taking any of the annual required Federal information security training. She and her staff were not vigilant at all, in fact the exact opposite. That training lays it all out. I take it every year. They all ignored it.

This would be very easy to determine. All the training pops up automatic in their training accounts. They either never had them setup or never logged into it. If you do not complete the training you get red flags. That is where a competency manager comes into play. Whoever that was was likely one of the ones told to keep his or her mouth shut.

Funny, the YouTube channel is CBS This Morning yet I get the Not available in your country error.
Go pound sand CBS.

originally posted by: ShadowLink
Funny, the YouTube channel is CBS This Morning yet I get the Not available in your country error.
Go pound sand CBS.

Looks like Canada enjoys "freedom of suppress".

a reply to: xuenchen

Heh, we are in the same boat here as you guys. All of our Canadian news channels are just as biased on the election as CNN, it's sick.

I'm just going to assume they made that video unavailable in Canada intentionally so we don't see how crooked Hillary is.
Too bad for them, most of us already know whats going on behind the veil.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Those who can't do, teach.

Ever heard that saying? Lol

As Trump stated during the 3rd debate: "Such a nasty woman!"

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The video completely proves she blatantly lied about knowing the State Dept. security protocols regarding email security.

Does it?

Because all she said in the video is to be vigilant about cyber security.

How does that prove anything?

If it has to be explained to you, there is no hope for you!

How much are you getting paid to be so dense?

originally posted by: goou111

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The video completely proves she blatantly lied about knowing the State Dept. security protocols regarding email security.

Does it?

Because all she said in the video is to be vigilant about cyber security.

How does that prove anything?

LOL. What does be vigilant mean? Not what Hillary did.

There is no evidence her server was ever hacked.

Just that she wasn't supposed to be using a private server.

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: goou111

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The video completely proves she blatantly lied about knowing the State Dept. security protocols regarding email security.

Does it?

Because all she said in the video is to be vigilant about cyber security.

How does that prove anything?

LOL. What does be vigilant mean? Not what Hillary did.

There is no evidence her server was ever hacked.

Just that she wasn't supposed to be using a private server.

Vigilant about cyber-security means following protocols, rules, et cetera, of which you just admitted she shouldn't have been using a private server.

A clear violation because: 1- she wasn't supposed to; and 2- it wasn't secured by government professionals.

Yet you still defend her?

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: IAMTAT

That is freaking hillarious.

Kind of hard for her defenders to defend.
Still...I'd love to hear how this isn't HRC hypocrisy taken to a new kind of 'Stupid' level.

Finally the first thing I've heard you say I can agree with...what is there to defend...nothing it's so far past defending you just can't. How do you feign ignorance about technology when you give the lecture in video no less to your entire department...like seriously...how does that get defended...even the most ardent supporters should be upset about being lied to.

What is there to defend?

edit on 21-10-2016 by RickyD because: (no reason given)

The quote system to a crap on me...I'm sure you get it

edit on 21-10-2016 by RickyD because: (no reason given)