It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Chelsea-Ordered Clinton Foundation Audit Warned That Donors Expect Quid Pro Quo

page: 1
22

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:56 PM
link   
This story comes from one leaky email in the Podesta Files.

It deals with the Clinton Foundation inside operations and how it may have been Chelsea Clinton that was worried about the sloppiness.

Can't confirm Chelsea's involvement, but an audit did apparently happen and the results were certainly pointing to expected favors from Hillary while she was Secretary of State.

Proof the CF is a Schlock operation.

Note the audit is NOT from the IRS.

Can anybody confirm Chelsea's involvement and her own "competence / incompetence" ratio?

Chelsea-Ordered Clinton Foundation Audit Warned That Donors Expect Quid Pro Quo


Near the end of 2011 Chelsea Clinton who felt uncomfortable about the way the Clinton Foundation was being run ordered an audit their operations. Called the Clinton Foundation Governance Review, the emails with audit were released by Wikileaks on Thursday. The audit was conducted by the Law Firm of Simpson Thacher (embedded below). Overall Simpson Thacher said that Clinton Foundation did not have the necessary independent oversight as required by federal charity law.


The Simpson Thacher audit also found:

* The foundation board didn’t have the necessary independence, instead it was filled with Clinton insiders.
* The board failed in it’s fiduciary responsibilities
* The board ignores conflicts of interest
* Audits wanted them to change their accounting methods. The Foundation’s auditors have, in 2009 and 2010, indicated that material weaknesses exist including variously in segregation of accounting duties, review of journal entries, audit adjustments and financial statement preparation, and lack of Board meetings. The auditors also noted that books are kept on a cash, not an accrual basis. These issues do not appear to have been addressed by the Board. Separately, interviewees reported their belief that certain employees abuse expense privileges (e.g., charging the Foundation and President for personal expenses) and do not follow the Foundation’s travel expense policy.




posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:11 PM
link   

The audit was conducted by the Law Firm of Simpson Thacher (embedded below).


Right people because LAWYERS are accountants!!!!!

The only time you call a lawyer is when you've done ILLEGAL stuff.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:12 PM
link   
Thank goodness for Twitter and ATS, otherwise Wikileaks would be primarily ignored. Well, the MSM do not appear to be interested in what is going on and the exposure of what it takes to become POTUS, by consent of the Establishment.


Gin

posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:24 PM
link   
Spotted this today on 4chan. Anons are doing great job.



podesta-emails/emailid/2346



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:25 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

The Clinton Foundation has passed every charity rating organization there is. It is a good thing if Chelsea ordered an audit, the source in the OP is a bit sketchy, though.

It still could never come close to the fake Trump Foundation in problems. It's audit is simple. I shall audit it now:

1) Collect money form smaller charities.
2) Take credit, get award for giving to charity.
3) Receive award at your own resort where you charge the people holding the event a few hundred thousand.
4) Buy things for yourself with foundation money, yet never auction for charity nor give them to charity.
5) Only employ your family in it.
6) Pay fines and a bribe with the money.
7) Not give any of your own money to it since 2008.
8) Accept, I think it was $300k from Comedy Central Roast and money disappears.
9) Set it up for money made form a book and never make it a real foundation.
edit on 15-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

That's why us peons should be doing everything we can to spread and disseminate all this information. We all know the MSM isn't going to do it.

Thankfully many seem to be doing just that but sadly just as many are fighting to discredit and hide it. Despicable.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: ShadowLink
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

That's why us peons should be doing everything we can to spread and disseminate all this information. We all know the MSM isn't going to do it.

Thankfully many seem to be doing just that but sadly just as many are fighting to discredit and hide it. Despicable.


Yes, please spread what I posted above your post.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:30 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

All nice and pretty.

But this is about the audit and what they found to be sloppy.




posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: reldra

All nice and pretty.

But this is about the audit and what they found to be sloppy.



They still have a very good rating from charity watchdogs. It employs 2,000 people. It runs their own schools and organizations. Yiou can look up ratings for the Clinton Foundation. It is real, regardless of any 'sloppiness' found due to their requesting an audit of themselves.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:45 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Why would I spread anything you post, you're nothing. A nobody.

The way you jump to defend or deflect someone such as Clinton every chance you get sickens me. The word shill comes to mind but hey, that's your personal choice, you're a big girl.

You can do your own spreading as you have been doing all along and I will continue to do mine. Fair enough? Good.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

LOL

The proven ties to the expected favors mean zero?

Wake up.




posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96




The only time you call a lawyer is when you've done ILLEGAL stuff.
Yea but both lawyer and accountant well tell you that if you can get away with it ........:>)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96


The audit was conducted by the Law Firm of Simpson Thacher (embedded below).


Right people because LAWYERS are accountants!!!!!

The only time you call a lawyer is when you've done ILLEGAL stuff.


Actually that is false... Both corporations and large NGOs usually have lawyers either as advisors or general counsels IN-HOUSE to give advice on legal issues, help with contracts, take part in negotiations, make sure that current or future moves are compliant with current law, etc. In fact, virtually all major organizations have such lawyers... Literally every major corporation for example.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

Keep on defending one percenters.

heavy.com...

CLinton Foundation shuns veterans groups for foreign causes that allow less transparency

Two Clintons. 41 Years $3 Billion dollars

The Inside Stroy of how the CLintons built a $ 2 Billion global empire

Clinton foundation has raised nearly $2 billion and some key questions.

For a group of people that claim to hate billionaire oligarchs.

Don't know why Clinton supporters are trying to elect 'two'.
edit on 15-10-2016 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

Keep on defending one percenters.

heavy.com...

CLinton Foundation shuns veterans groups for foreign causes that allow less transparency

Two Clintons. 41 Years $3 Billion dollars

The Inside Stroy of how the CLintons built a $ 2 Billion global empire

Clinton foundation has raised nearly $2 billion and some key questions.

For a group of people that claim to hate billionaire oligarchs.

Don't know why Clinton supporters are trying to elect 'two'.


I'm not "defending one percenters," at all.. I'm pointing out your logical fallacy that people only have lawyers around when they break the law..

I am a heavy Clinton critic, so don't really appreciate your projections.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 12:43 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Lol. Really? Good luck with that. I think plenty of people in prison for crimes they didn't commit would disagree. You know who lawyers up? Smart people.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: reldra

LOL

The proven ties to the expected favors mean zero?

Wake up.



But dude, she has a vagina! First woman president! That's all that matters! So she's a corrupt, sociopathic, criminal, so what? Vagina, woman...WWIII? Who cares, first vagina in charge in the White House.

edit on 16-10-2016 by HUMBLEONE because: Vagina, Vagina, Vagina



new topics

top topics



 
22

log in

join