It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bones: Forensic evidence indicating the use of explosives on September 11th, 2001.

page: 7
43
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 03:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Floridagoat

My first obvious question to the rigged explosives theory is why would you rig the whole building like that only to not do the top floors and risk your plot being unfolded?


The official narrative of the movement was each floor of the towers were rigged with demolitions. If the resistance of each floor was not removed, then the collapse speed would have been slower. The claims of the movement, the speed of the WTC towers collapse was ONLY achieved by the softening of EACH floor with demolitions

Then you have the claims of the towers fell into their own footprints. The movement's claim, without softening each WTC floor with demolitions, the towers would have fell over like trees.

The movement claims, 30 collapsing floors cannot cause the remaining 70 to 80 floors to collapse. They have taken the stance it's impossible. The remaining floor should have remained standing.

The three points above are argued religious by the movement. Their stance is the tower's collapse was only possible by demolitions setting of on each floor.

Going to rant more, or have some proof.
edit on 9-10-2016 by neutronflux because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-10-2016 by neutronflux because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 03:35 PM
link   
You don't get it, according to Richard Gage / AE991Trurh, ever aspect of the WTC collapse was impossible. The truther movement has made it clear their stance of the WTC towers collapse is only possible by the floor by floor detonation of demolitions.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Floor by floor? No, it looks like the detonations kind of got ahead of that and ran down the face of the building many floors ahead, as can be seen in this video, particularly the zoomed slomo part towards the end.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: AnkhMorpork

It's been discussed before ATS. The collapsing floors and debris acting like a piston forced pulverized concrete and drywall out ventilation ducts. Funny how it's symmetrical in the middle?

The squibs were air currents pushing pulverized dust and dry wall around in the wake of falling debris.

Let's put it this way. The Towers have been debated for 15 years. You have no new arguments.

There has never been a top down demolitions implosion of a building floor by floor.

There has never been a building imploded with demolitions over 50 floors.

So the conspiracists narrative was carried out flawlessly by a demolitions system compromised by fire twice in one day of a top down floor by floor implosion demolition of buildings 110 floors.

Also, by persons that were trying to work the country into a war frenzy by dropping the towers neatly into the conspiracists narrative of the towers own footprints? Why?

There was a minimum of 110 charges per tower to fit the conspiracists narrative. A more realistic number would be 4 per floor. That would be 440 charges, or 880 charges for the two towers. (Steve Jones used to talk about a million ceiling tiles coated with thermite?)


No audio of demolitions detonations on WTC videos. The most recorded terrorists attack in history.

No columns drilled, prepared, or work on by cutting or blasting charges.

No physical evidence or fragments of shape charges, blasting caps, remote detonators, ignition systems, nor items to contain a blast to columns and prevent the spread of shrapnel.

No shrapnel worked on by demolitions spraying out of the towers, imbedded in near by buildings and equipment. No shrapnel worked on by demolitions recovered with victims, bodies, nor human remains.

Richard Gage stated the charges were designed to fizzle and not flash. Where does that leave persons claiming to have witnessed explosions at the WTC towers?

And your argument comes down to dust clouds from a 500,000 ton collapsing tower that has been explained without explosives.
edit on 10-10-2016 by neutronflux because: (no reason given)

edit on 10-10-2016 by neutronflux because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 08:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: neutronflux

Floor by floor? No, it looks like the detonations kind of got ahead of that and ran down the face of the building many floors ahead, as can be seen in this video, particularly the zoomed slomo part towards the end.





The real question. If the visual squibs were created by demolitions, there where is the sound of detonations and the resultant shrapnel?



new topics

top topics
 
43
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join