It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

National Truther Symposium Chicago IL Dec 12,2016 to "Iron out the details"

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 10 2016 @ 10:28 AM
link   
Wouldn't that be nice ?
Nice that they would finally come up with one concise explanation for all the details of 911.
Up til now it's all been a free for all of theories.
CDers/Nukers/Space beamers all in one place to give us the precise explanation as how the towers fell.




posted on Sep, 10 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
Yeah it would be, but the cognitive dissonance is such that we'll all be long gone before the truth comes out, and then there will be a collective yawn at all the destruction that has come about because of small cognitively challenged minds up against pure evil.

Sorry, no F and no S for you. You're not interested in learning, only in ridicule. Shame.



posted on Sep, 10 2016 @ 11:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: samkent
Wouldn't that be nice ?
Nice that they would finally come up with one concise explanation for all the details of 911.


But that would mean some of the truthers would have to admit their own silly pet theory, like mini nukes were used, was wrong!



posted on Sep, 10 2016 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: samkent

great thread !!!!






posted on Sep, 10 2016 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: samkent
Wouldn't that be nice ?
Nice that they would finally come up with one concise explanation for all the details of 911.
Up til now it's all been a free for all of theories.
CDers/Nukers/Space beamers all in one place to give us the precise explanation as how the towers fell.


That might be the only thing you have ever said that I agree with.

You going to post some links and give us a taste?

I do not think there could ever be a unified theory into 9/11.

If it was simply "allowed" to happen, it would take at least till 2051 before documents that could paint a picture start being declassified.

If it was a grand nefarious plan, that would have to involve psychopathic murderers and the length of any investigation would leave ample time for anyone motivated to get rid of those that could testify.

Crimes this big do not get investigated that well. This was not some crime, somewhere in the world. The was a world wide crime. Players from all over the globe could have had interest in this. It changed the world, if any of you remember.



posted on Sep, 10 2016 @ 11:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: samkent
Wouldn't that be nice ?
Nice that they would finally come up with one concise explanation for all the details of 911.


But that would mean some of the truthers would have to admit their own silly pet theory, like mini nukes were used, was wrong!


Not just mini nukes. Thermite and holograms would have a tough time submitting too.

It's best to just ignore any of the religious thinkers, except the OS religion, because that is obviously the mark.



posted on Sep, 10 2016 @ 12:53 PM
link   
I wish there was information or links in the op to what this is about.



posted on Sep, 10 2016 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: samkent
Wouldn't that be nice ?
Nice that they would finally come up with one concise explanation for all the details of 911.


But that would mean some of the truthers would have to admit their own silly pet theory, like mini nukes were used, was wrong!


Does anyone else see the irony in this?

What good would having everyone who doesn't believe the OS conform to one theory? Since the only people who know for sure what exactly happened are the perpetrators, to narrow it down to one specific scenario would only make it easier for "debunkers" to try to poke holes in.

Seems like something that Richard Gage and Steven Jones would come up with.

Age old saying: A true teacher will never teach you WHAT to think, but rather HOW to think.


(post by Tuomptonite removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)


top topics



 
3

log in

join