It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"is designed to manipulate the audience at the rational level by either discrediting conflicting information or supporting false conclusions. Disinformation may include distribution of forged documents, manuscripts, and photographs, or spreading dangerous rumours and fabricated intelligence."
“As an immediate consequence of the Robertson Panel recommendations, in February 1953, the Air Force issued Regulation 200-2, ordering air base officers to publicly discuss UFO incidents only if they were judged to have been solved, and to classify all the unsolved cases to keep them out of the public eye.”
“In December 1953, Joint Army-Navy-Air Force Regulation number 146 made it a crime for military personnel to discuss classified UFO reports with unauthorized persons. Violators faced up to two years in prison and/or fines of up to $10,000.”
Yes, various reports suggest that. Tell me, is there any single report which includes all of these factors? If not, what reason is there to assume they all have the same origin rather than being separate (and unexplained) phenomena? If such incredible characteristics were not attributable to a single incident, how can they be wrapped into the ET blanket?
After reading this report, one can conclude that these UFO’s were solid, they emitted colored lights, they made no noise, they moved erratically at times, sometimes their movement “appears at times to be evasive action”, they could travel a thousand miles an hour and apparently they could hover and stop mid flight.
originally posted by: Phage
...what reason is there to assume they all have the same origin rather than being separate (and unexplained) phenomena? If such incredible characteristics were not attributable to a single incident, how can they be wrapped into the ET blanket?
After reading this report, one can conclude that these UFO’s were solid, they emitted colored lights, they made no noise, they moved erratically at times, sometimes their movement “appears at times to be evasive action”, they could travel a thousand miles an hour and apparently they could hover and stop mid flight.
No natural phenomenon can account for the majority of observation reports accompanied by electromagnetic detections made by one or several radars. Both the defense services and air traffic control have been confronted a number of times around the world with unknown aerial intrusions or artificially induced phenomena.”
The behavior of these devices during encounters with fighter jets or interceptors – some have participated in real swirling battles in the U.S. – suggests they are controlled, guided or led by particularly sophisticated automation.
*“remarkable accelerations of the craft right after a stationary mode,” the report indicates: “We feel that we must reject the thesis of a terrestrial origin for all the observations made since World War Two. Indeed, if a nation of the world had been able to secretly develop such an armada of exotic craft, like those observed for more than half a century, the means of analysis and strategic logistics available would have permitted their rapid identification.
>>The illegal overflights which they have been guilty of conducting could constitute a casus belli [cause for war].”...“the above features suggest that in many cases the devices detected, far from being unidentified, are easily recognizable by the aerial defense agencies as part of a technology far ahead of ours.
“Thus, the central hypothesis proposed by the COMETA report still cannot be rejected up to this day and remains perfectly credible,” they wrote. “Many documents and materials examined by the authors of this report confirm it. We have therefore retained, among some others but only as a working hypothesis, the possibility that most of the craft observed can have a non-terrestrial origin.”
And, it should be noted, COMETA had no sanction from anyone but itself.
Wrapping widely disparate accounts (with scant physical evidence of any sort) in a single blanket is not a valid approach. Assuming a single origin to a wide array, is just that.
Maybe. To be specific, it was pointing out that COMETA was a backslapping group. Not unlike MUFON.
What is that, a reverse appeal to authority(?).
The problem is you are ignoring the the actual facts. The fact that, yes, there are reports of unexplained aerial phenomena but that there is nothing which connects them except that they are unexplained.
The problem is you are ignoring a major detail and misrepresenting the entirety of the status of investigation.
Experimental aircraft and electronic warfare tech would be a good reason. Neither of which you want to be general knowledge if you're a military type.
Now, the question is why are people so intent to continue to cover up and ignore this subject.
Might you disclose an explanation of such disinformation?
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
Even if the spin on the various committees and their alleged agendas is true, getting people to actively put forward credible explanations for observed phenomena that don't involve aliens and their spaceships does not automatically lead to the conclusion that there were actually little green men involved in the sightings, or even that these sightings were genuine.
In the eyes of conspiracy theorists disinformation seems largely to be just information they don't like.
Yes, various reports suggest that. Tell me, is there any single report which includes all of these factors?
The problem is you are ignoring the the actual facts. The fact that, yes, there are reports of unexplained aerial phenomena but that there is nothing which connects them except that they are unexplained.
Summer, 1933 Chrysville (Pennsylvania). A man observed a faint violet light in a field between this town and Morres-
town. Walking to it, he found an ovoid object 3 m in diameter and 2 m thick with a circular opening similar to a vault door. Pushing it, he found the room full of violet light and observed many instruments, no occupant. Smell of ammonia. (APRO Jul., 64)
Mar., 1954 Santa Maria (Brazil). Rubem Hellwig was driving when he saw a football-shaped machine, the size of a
Volkswagen, on the ground. He walked toward it and met two men of slim build, normal height, their faces brownish, wearing no helmets. One was inside the object while the other collected grass samples. They spoke to Hellwig in a strange language, and yet he said he understood they were asking for ammonia. He directed them to a nearby town. The craft vanished silently and instantly with blue and yellow flames. (1; Humanoids 33)
Brazil 1996 Varginha UFO incident
The Silva sisters said they fled and told mother they had seen the "devil" (an appearance described as 'brown faced skin, with red eyes. The woman did not believe them up until she went to the area where they had allegedly seen the creature, and smelled a strong ammonia-like odor, and found nothing but its footsteps and a dog sniffing the place. After relating their tale to family and friends, rumors began to spread throughout the city regarding UFO sightings and alien creatures being abducted by the military forces. Two days later, another creature was allegedly found lying along a road. Three military trucks were supposedly sent to retrieve it.
You are also making a false assumption, "nothing links them so they are unexplained". What does that even mean??
The fact that, yes, there are reports of unexplained aerial phenomena but that there is nothing which connects them except that they are unexplained.
You are also making a false assumption, "nothing links them so they are unexplained". What does that even mean??
If you did a drug trial but told the lab involved they are not allowed to include or even have access to 90% of the clinical trial data, and then made a conclusion off that, is that science? No, it's scientific fraud.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: boncho
The leading theory, at the current time....being the ET or Visitation Hypothesis
Is that the leading theory amongst ufo experts on the Internet?
Obviously it's not the leading theory in any main stream science that I know of.
Haines was once a UFO skeptic until he started hearing reports from commercial pilots who shared their UFO experiences with him. He eventually created an organization called the National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP), which serves as a confidential reporting venue for pilots, crews and air traffic controllers who are otherwise afraid to make UFO reports. “I was trying to be a conscientious scientist and let the chips fall where they may and I immediately found a great deal of bias and fear by people who shouldn’t be afraid. Science should not be afraid,”
“When the controller checked with military people, they said they did have a target [on radar] — not just one target, but a double primary target,” said John Callahan, former head of the Federal Aviation Administration’s Accidents, Evaluations and Investigations Division in the 1980s. “When the pilot first reported the UFO, he said it was a huge ball of light and about four times bigger than the 747 he was flying,” Callahan told The Huffington Post. The more than 30-minute close encounter ended when the UFO vanished. But the most telling part of this case is the aftermath when Callahan was contacted by the CIA. “I get a call from this guy in the CIA who tells me he wants to talk to me about the UFO. I said, ‘What UFO?’ He said, ‘The one that was in Alaska.’” The next day, Callahan found himself at a meeting with individuals from Pres. Ronald Reagan’s scientific staff, the CIA and FBI, where he was told to hand all the materials about the case over to them. “After I showed them the materials three times, one of the scientists stood up asking questions about the radar. Finally, another man stepped forward and said, ‘OK,’ and he pointed to the screen and said, ‘This event never happened. We were never here. We’re confiscating all this data and you’re all sworn to secrecy.’
On July 7, 1947 William Rhodes took a picture of a strange object in Arizona. The pictures were published in a Phoenix newspaper and several other publications. An Army Air Force intelligence officer and a member of the FBI soon met with Rhodes and talked him into turning over the negatives. They then told him he would not be getting them back. The pictures ended up in classified Air Force UFO reports.
In 1958, Donald Keyhole, a retired US Marine and UFO specialist, appeared on TV. His commentary about UFOs was “pre-censored” by the Air Force. As the show went on, when he tried to interject original statements that were not in the “pre-censored” script, the network cut his sound, saying later that he was about to violate security standards. Conspiracy theorists believe that what he was about to reveal were several unknown military studies that make the assertion that UFOs were interplanetary.
To be classed as an unknown, a UFO report also had to be "good," meaning that it had to come from a competent observer and had to contain a reasonable amount of data...