Was this U.F.O ever identified or has it remained unidentified?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: reldra

I don't know what it is, but being that 2 different people took 2 different videos,

You are very trusting.

I find it unlikely, and then a third person put the 2 together. It doesn't ring a bell as a known hoaxer.

a reply to: Phage

I always thought it was a big pinwheel Pyro stunt.
As far as the multi view, the ufo sighting over Temple Mount hoax is a good example of teamwork.

www.livescience.com...

Big thread here which has 653 flags.

free_spirit has raw footage supposedly and can answer any major questions.

May be good to get his perspective early in this thread.

B

a reply to: Bspiracy
While free_spirit is very helpful with "debunking" videos that Jaime has not been involved with, the converse is not necessarily the case. Sort of odd.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: Phage

Even you can come up with a fresher response. That CGI post is getting old.

He's short circuiting.

It's not bugs, birds or balloons so he hasn't the foggiest.

Predictable response under those circumstances.

a reply to: reldra

With CADD programs, it's very easy to render one thing and be able to view it from multiple angles. I agree the CGI wasn't tampered with, but only viewed from two angles.

a reply to: odzeandennz
Has the computer generator been confirmed to exist? To support the CGI theory?

originally posted by: randomtangentsrme
a reply to: reldra

With CADD programs, it's very easy to render one thing and be able to view it from multiple angles. I agree the CGI wasn't tampered with, but only viewed from two angles.

I believe you, not an expert. I just looked at the other thread pointed out by Bspiracy and it appears there is actually more than 1 video from more than one person.

A weather balloon has one radiosonde.
They don;t even look like that.
An instrument package in a boxlike configuration.

a reply to: Phage

But, even if it is physical, there have to be hoaxy ways to pull it off.
For one thing, the "balloons" seem to be pulled out, or drawn out of a large spherical plastic bag.

Imagine a small aircraft that is towing this large thing about a mile behind it, on a heavy mono-filament.
Some mechanism that releases a drogue chute out the end to cause enough drag to pull out a string of balloons, and also enables the balloons to be pulled out from the towed end.

Do-able? Hey, there are some fairly ingenious hoaxers out there!

I imagine it could look something like that, just 2c to ponder.

a reply to: charlyv
Understood charlyv
To 1 subjectively it seems if U.F.O are going to be called CGI that at least the hoaxer be confirmed, otherwise there exist no supportive data for CGI except for when claimed or acknowledged image data professionals speak in on it.
Not doubting said image professionals / specialist input, but the objectivity of who made the CGI interest changes to the input of proclaimed specialist... And so leaving trust in specialist hands, why ignoring or forgetting who made it if its a hoax...

a reply to: Phage

I had read the thread and i think the footage wasnt his and he isnt allowed to distribute it if i remember corrrectly.

B

a reply to: Ophiuchus 13

The "orbs" that the "ufo" is depositing are behaving like they are attached by a string or rope, because they are.

I have seen this video before, its not CGI, its real. It's exactly what I said it was, a balloon cluster.

Look at the S curve of the "orbs".

Mexican video with background music = hoax

It's amazing how all the good UFO videos happen in Mexico and are promoted by Jaime Maussan.

Its just really weird.

I think if someone were to hoax a cgi video, it would not be as weird.

Whats weird about the objects is that they do not fall as if subject to gravity. The matter also has a liquid quality. It seems on one side they curve downward, while on the other side they curve upwards. It seems like later some of the matter that was spewed off joined back with the original blob. Some of the matter looks like it hung around in the air.

Maybe some UFO technology that used morphing matter went awry and fell apart?

a reply to: BIGPoJo

The "orbs" that the "ufo" is depositing are behaving like they are attached by a string or rope, because they are. I have seen this video before, its not CGI, its real. It's exactly what I said it was, a balloon cluster. Look at the S curve of the "orbs".

If it were the wind that was propelling the balloons, how would it propel the balloons in opposite directions?

Is there anyone, ANYONE, out there taking UFO movies who can hold a camera/cellphone still? Or, do they all have Parkinson's?

originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
Is there anyone, ANYONE, out there taking UFO movies who can hold a camera/cellphone still? Or, do they all have Parkinson's?

Bit of an insult to people who actually suffer with Parkinson's.

You must be aware that the zoom on a cellphone is just a digital enlargement, not optical and that any camera used at what is probably full-zoom, will greatly exaggerate the slightest hand movement. Unfortunately, we do not all carry tripods around, just in case the occasional UFO appears in the sky.

The thing is, if this were a perfectly sharp video, the cries of "CGI!!" would be ringing around extremely loudly. And, on the CGI angle, if someone was to be faking this video, surely to God, they would have made it more interesting and 'alien' than this.

Looks like balloons to me, but why they are behaving in that way, is beyond me.

For me, the true value of any video or photo is what happens with it down the line. Do we learn anything more from it? Is additional evidence found?

In this case -- no. Even if it is aliens or trans-dimensional drones or whatever, it doesn't make any difference because nothing new or further ever resulted from it, placing it squarely in the file cabinet with all the rest of the crap.

Even for you folks who firmly believe it to be authentic and true... authentic and true of what? Some odd thing in the sky that we can't identify? Sheesh.