It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Hillary Clinton Should Concede to Bernie Sanders Before The FBI Reveals Its Findings

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on May, 11 2016 @ 06:05 PM

originally posted by: muse7

He will be endorsing her

You think so?
Before or after the FBI is done investigating her?

In fact I'm pretty damn sure once Sanders drops out he will endorse her too

That would then make him a shill. I'd enjoy watching the moment.

posted on May, 11 2016 @ 06:23 PM

originally posted by: schuyler
It's not going to happen, and declaring it should is delusional.

Not delusional, just very biased and wishful thinking from an individual who has been on Bernie's bandwagon for the past 9 months and hasn't yet realized that there is no way in hell Sanders gets the nomination. Even if Clinton drops out or is brought to trial, the DNC is simply not going to nominate Bernie Sanders...

ETA: I'd actually be OK with Sanders as the nominee. He's managed to collect 75% of the popular votes as Clinton has, 9.4 Mil to 12.5 mil. He's losing to one of the most hated, corrupt, unpopular politicians in the world... why is that? Is it the fact that Democrats who have gainful employment, support themselves, and aren't below the negative net tax threshold are just as disturbed by the idea of socialism in the US as Republicans are? Could it be that Democrats are voting against Bernie Sanders more than they are voting for Clinton? Could it be that the sanctity of one's wallet is important at the polls even among Democrats? If that's the case, who in their right mind would switch their vote if Bernie is the nominee? Hillary voters will either vote for Trump or, more likely, stay home on election day... either way, Trump isn't going to lose in November unless the Dems drop some manner of political A-bomb on this debacle and nominate Joe Biden or Blomberg at the convention... and even then I wouldn't bet any money against Trump.
edit on 11-5-2016 by burdman30ott6 because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 11 2016 @ 06:56 PM
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Nice try, factless opinion, and a personal attack!

Oh my!

posted on May, 11 2016 @ 07:02 PM
a reply to: Lucidparadox

This witch hunt is rediculous.

Not really, considering there's actually a witch to hunt...

Gettin my goon boots, pitchfork, and torches ready to hand...there's fixiin ta be a burnin!

posted on May, 11 2016 @ 07:20 PM
a reply to: AlaskanDad

Personal attack?

top topics
<< 1   >>

log in