It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Interesting, my intent was to agree with you, while pointing out that Bilderbergs may be looking at the $18 trillion Sanders plans may cost as minor to a much bigger game they're playing.
There is a lot of speculation that another crash of wall street is hanging in balance, so asking who would sign a bailout check is not only fair game, but is quite prudent.
We need an end to the Regan era, that brought the DC, corporates revolving door policies and trickle down economics!
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: MotherMayEye
HRC voted for TARP, Sen Sanders voted against it. he felt it lacked restrictions and let the FED and banks with a blank check.
In politics there are few certainties, but HRC never voted against a bailout and you can bank on that!
Pardon my pun, but it does have a ring of truth to it.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Do we have rulers, leaders or representatives?
The corporations want to saddle us with their chosen rulers and leaders, what we need is representation of, by and for the people.
That means not electing a representative of Goldman Sachs for president
originally posted by: WonOunce
Hooray for higher taxes and more regulations. Wooohooo. Just what the founding fathers fought for!
originally posted by: OpenMindedRealist
My liberal friends are dropping like flies. Told them they shouldn't hold their breath...
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Is that not how Trump and Sanders are in the race? they're party outsiders?