It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
a reply to: Bedlam
Another thing to consider here Bedlam is the MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) process. Of course this employs pulses of radio wave energy and a computer to make pictures of organs and structures inside the body so I'm not saying that a dog's retina structure is at all similar to this process, but it seems to indicate that magnetic lines of force can produce "images". Technically, however, the image comes from radio frequency changes in the atoms and not the magnetic field itself. Still, it is a concept to consider for some out of the box thoughts on this subject.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Bedlam
I doubt this has anything to do with Hallucinations.
More likely the effect of Earthquakes is enough to startle animals, in no different a way. Than really loud sound or really bright light causes a reaction in animals than the changes to the magnetic field, during an earth quake.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
a reply to: Bedlam
That doesn't say anything on how the brain perceives the information.
It's just a matter of time before we invent glasses to view magnetic fields and that light and magnetism are very close related imo.
Well, I guess "never" is a measure of time. You can't see magnetic fields, really, you can't. Or electric fields either.
Our understanding of all this is just at it's beginnings, it would be ignorant to believe what we know or think doesn't contain any errors.
As i said, further investigation could shed more light.
We're pretty cool on the basic behavior of light, electric, and magnetic fields. One elicits "sight", two others don't. Because electric and magnetic fields don't emit or reflect photons. They can't be refracted, and don't focus to provide an image. Hell, you can't even see radio waves and they're the same thing as light, only lower frequency.
The title of the thread is just a copy of the article which clearly says,...May Be Able To See Magnetic Fields.
Sure. I understand. But it's a magazine article writer's spin on a cool topic, and as usual, it's wrong.
Hell, they've got basic stuff wrong, too. They say that primates can't do it, and while they may not do it through cytochrome in the retina like a dog, I've known many a person that could tell you north, even when they were underground. I can't do it. But we did some ad hoc experimentation on a few people, and they could always find north, even disoriented in a new environment and unable to get visual cues from the sky (some people can see polarization in the blue light of the sky that tells them the direction of North). We were able to fox them by putting them in the SCIF, which is pretty well shielded by steel walls. But outside it, they got it in a few seconds.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
a reply to: Bedlam
I totally get what your saying here Bedlam, but I politely disagree somewhat as I believe there is no real image in the brain, merely on the retina.
No information, no image. It's really that simple.
You can't "see" an detailed image created by something that's giving you a vector and an intensity. I don't care if it conjures up memories of the old home place, that's not "seeing" magnetic fields.
You guys are frantically doing backflips trying to beat this into "seeing magnetic fields". It's sad, really it is.
If no structure in your eye interacts with magnetic fields but your retina, you will. Not. Form. An. Image. Damn, man. Pinholes are for photons. Magnetic fields are not photons.
BTW, real image is opposed to virtual image, it's an optics term, not a philosophical statement on whether perception is real or not.
And if you're high on some hallucinogen and a scent is 'perceived as sight', I guarantee you you can't read by it, or tell who's in the room, unless it's Mr Horse. Because there's no information there. It's triggering a memory.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
I forget where I saw the study but it was a sampling of dog owners who were asked to record which direction their dogs faced when relieving themselves and close to 70% of the time they aligned themselves with magnetic north.
I know my two dogs do this as they will simultaneously face the same direction while taking a dump on the neighbors lawn.
He can than Obama for that.
originally posted by: dragonridr
Why do people take science and turn it into their interpretation when you can read the paper.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Bedlam
I doubt this has anything to do with Hallucinations. More likely the effect of Earthquakes is enough to startle animals, in no different a way. Than really loud sound or really bright light causes a reaction in animals than the changes to the magnetic field, during an earth quake.
Animals react to such an event in no different a way than they would respond to fire in the visual sense, or an explosion in an auditory sense.
They simply respond to a threat in no different a way and an auditory or visual equivalent to sensing the magnetic effect of an Earthquake.
Which to them is profound enough to travel in an opposite direction from what the sense is a threat.
The belief that animals can predict earthquakes has been around for centuries.
In 373 B.C., historians recorded that animals, including rats, snakes and weasels, deserted the Greek city of Helice in droves just days before a quake devastated the...
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
a reply to: Bedlam
Another thing to consider here Bedlam is the MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) process. Of course this employs pulses of radio wave energy and a computer to make pictures of organs and structures inside the body so I'm not saying that a dog's retina structure is at all similar to this process, but it seems to indicate that magnetic lines of force can produce "images". Technically, however, the image comes from radio frequency changes in the atoms and not the magnetic field itself. Still, it is a concept to consider for some out of the box thoughts on this subject.
Good Lord. Are you seriously going there?
You wonder if a dog's eye is similar to an MRI machine, since MRI imaging produces images and has "magnetic" in?
Do you..do you have any clue as to how MRI imaging works? If you did, I don't think you'd bring that idea up in public.
originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
Forgive me Bedlam, for I have sinned. I hope I will be absolved by doing some "Hail Bedlams" and some "Our Bedlams" after confession.
originally posted by: Bedlam
Yes. The animals may be able to sense magnetic fields, and react to that, like detecting a smell or a flash of light. What they won't do is look at a wall socket across the room and "see the magnetic fields" there.