It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: paraphi
a reply to: bjarneorn
Sorry, but the Protocols are no book comparable with the Bible, or Koran.
They are a work of fiction designed to stoke up anti-Semitism.
originally posted by: bjarneornThey DISCRIMINATE between the "people of God", and "infidels".
THERE IS NO GREATER DISCRIMINATION, than that.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
You say you've not even read the book you're discussing. That seems a bit odd. You're basing your thread on others interpretations, research, comments, opinions and conjecture.
Its like describing how a new car rides, handles and feels without having driven it. Pointless. You haven't done the minimum work : by reading it. So I wouldn't care to share in this topic.
Had you done the minimum required for your opinion, I would be greatly interests how you feel. But, you admit you haven't.
And, for that reason: I'm OUT. Good luck though....MS
If the Protocols were created by the Tsars police then they were very accurate and as relevant then as now.
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
I always feel like some people are missing the point when discussing the Protocols, it's pretty important to determine whether it's a hoax or not. But the main thing I take away from it isn't whether it's a hoax or not; it's that some shady group is definitely using these techniques on the masses.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
How on earth did this thread make it to four pages? The Protocols are a hoax - as has been known for almost a hundred years. Case long since closed.
Hoax Despite being shown to be a hoax as far back as 1921,[1] it is still distributed and believed by people who swallow whatever fiction fits with their racist views.[2]
In addition to its exposure as a forgery (by journalist Robert Graves of The Times) in 1921, a pamphlet containing three essays by Lucien Wolf called The Myth of the Jewish Menace in World Affairs debunking the Protocols was released in the same year.[3] A Swiss judge ruled the pamphlet to be a forgery in a 1935 decision in a case known as the Berne trial.[4]
originally posted by: paraphi
a reply to: trollz
Except Murdock is not a Jew. Anyway, apart from that glaring inaccuracy...
Rupert's father Sir Keith Murdoch
attained his prominent position in Australian society through a fortuitous marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene. Through his wife's connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked. There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm, two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a faraway mining town. For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew...
And that, as I am sure you know, makes him a Jew according to the law of the Talmud, and indeed according to the present laws of Israel.
originally posted by: paraphi
a reply to: bjarneorn
Sorry, but the Protocols are no book comparable with the Bible, or Koran.
They are a work of fiction designed to stoke up anti-Semitism. You are correct though in that the Protocols are still used today and the purpose of anti-Semitism rolls on. The main "users" of the messages are Islamic countries and even Hamas contains the Protocols in their Constitution.
The Protocols were written to breed hatred and distrust. They worked then, and they continue to pollute today. Made worse by people who seem to think they have a worthy message.
originally posted by: Truthspoon
It's real..... and if it IS a forgery then it's a very prescient one.
originally posted by: Truthspoon
It's real..... and if it IS a forgery then it's a very prescient one.
originally posted by: hellobruce
It IS a forgery, and the reason it is persistent is Jew haters just love to hate and push this hoax.