It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: nwtrucker
I'm not sure a president can pardon this level of criminal 'F>#up, since it was so blatant, disregarding warnings without further ado like she always does.
We should have already seen her dancing in the wind at the end of a rope.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: nwtrucker
I'm not sure a president can pardon this level of criminal 'F>#up, since it was so blatant, disregarding warnings without further ado like she always does.
We should have already seen her dancing in the wind at the end of a rope.
Really? You think, considering Obama's track record, that hen wouldn't issue a pardon? On, say, his last day in office?
My guess would be he wouldn't hesitate for a second, if so inclined.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: nwtrucker
I'm not sure a president can pardon this level of criminal 'F>#up, since it was so blatant, disregarding warnings without further ado like she always does.
We should have already seen her dancing in the wind at the end of a rope.
Really? You think, considering Obama's track record, that hen wouldn't issue a pardon? On, say, his last day in office?
My guess would be he wouldn't hesitate for a second, if so inclined.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Here's the biggest barrier of all to Hillary getting indicted, convicted or prison time.
Half the people wouldn't believe it if proof was shown and the other half of the people wouldn't believe if she was exonerated.
No matter what the truth is, half thinks she's guilty and half thinks she's not. That, by itself, pretty much puts a ribbon around this whole thing.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: MystikMushroom
The same PRIVATE NOT GOVERNMENT OWNED OR GOVERNMENT SECURED server! Dude, seriously?
Her server was private and held her publically paid for GOVERNMENTAL work product.
She wasn't a receptionist or clerk...she was the Secretary of State!
What makes you think a .gov email server would be more secure then a private email server? Also look how quickly she was able to give all that data to the FBI when hey asked. She didnt hide the fact that she had private servers and she did this before Obama changed the rules using a private email server.
Untill the FBI comes out with its findings all this is just a republican circlejerk and "grr cliton h8t cliton" campaign. Remeber, inoccent until proven guilty and not guilty no matter what anyone says before we have actual evidence.
originally posted by: Gully
Bernie better watch his back if he keeps climbing in the polls.
Clintons don't # around.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: MystikMushroom
The same PRIVATE NOT GOVERNMENT OWNED OR GOVERNMENT SECURED server! Dude, seriously?
Her server was private and held her publically paid for GOVERNMENTAL work product.
She wasn't a receptionist or clerk...she was the Secretary of State!
Yeah dude, what's the big deal if she pays for her own computers and sets up an email server and forwards a news article that millions of people have read?
originally posted by: Konduit
originally posted by: Gully
Bernie better watch his back if he keeps climbing in the polls.
Clintons don't # around.
I wouldn't be surprised if Bernie's campaign wagon just happened to pull a Michael Hastings and crash into a tree and explode, or if he just happens to keel over from a heart attack on the eve of his nomination like Andrew Breitbart right before he was suppose to release "damning" information on Obama.
A lot of weird coincidences surround people who threaten the Democratic establishment.