In honor of the fallen. Vaccine damage awareness month.

a reply to: Gothmog

not really, the preservative is added to prevent cross contamination in multidose vials. And no, "heavy metals" are not added to extend the expiry date of a vaccine, but to booster the immune response. So less antigen is needed to induce immunity. Which should be hailed as a good thing, less volume to be injected, hence less exposure to "toxic compounds"

and out of date is still out of date, it still gets tossed when the expiry date has passed. It doesn't matter if the expiry date is 1 month after production, or set for 2 years after production. And logic applied: the shorter the life of a vaccine, the bigger the chance that the vaccine will pass its expiry date before use, the more product will be wasted, the more product is being sold, the more money the company will generate. so extending the life of the vaccine is not beneficial for a company

originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: Gothmog

Mercury is one source of poisoning. Not the only one.

So you're re-hashing a Facebook meme from David "Avocado" Wolfe which was "sourced" from David Icke.
Way to science!

originally posted by: Gothmog
The second time I am commenting this on a thread. This is one of the best . Although , it is not the vaccine itself but the crap added by the medical industry to improve shelf life. Thats why , up until the last 20 years , they didnt research harmful effects of vaccines. When you were vaccinated between the 50s and say the 80s , it was a straight vaccine. When it went out of date , they tossed it.
Not today . Mercury and other heavy metals are added to extend the life of the vaccine . ALL in the name of MONEY

Aluminium was first used as an adjuvant in the mid 1920's.
Thimerosal was first added as a preservative in the 1930's.

So it seems that not only your knowledge of vaccine science is sub-standard but your history is too.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
How about we have a month for all those still dealing with polio...

That would be great.

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: Gothmog

Mercury is one source of poisoning. Not the only one.

So you're re-hashing a Facebook meme from David "Avocado" Wolfe which was "sourced" from David Icke.
Way to science!

Way to science? And that somehow changes mercury content and the biological outcome? That response didn't really deserve a response. Pharma has an entire network of writers, media shills and trolls. You could apply. It seems you have some of the skills required.

originally posted by: whismermill
a reply to: Gothmog

not really, the preservative is added to prevent cross contamination in multidose vials. And no, "heavy metals" are not added to extend the expiry date of a vaccine, but to booster the immune response. So less antigen is needed to induce immunity. Which should be hailed as a good thing, less volume to be injected, hence less exposure to "toxic compounds"

and out of date is still out of date, it still gets tossed when the expiry date has passed. It doesn't matter if the expiry date is 1 month after production, or set for 2 years after production. And logic applied: the shorter the life of a vaccine, the bigger the chance that the vaccine will pass its expiry date before use, the more product will be wasted, the more product is being sold, the more money the company will generate. so extending the life of the vaccine is not beneficial for a company

There is no safe amount of injected mercury for adults, let alone a neonate. But please tell us more about Pharma business and conflict of interest. You seem to be smart.

originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass

originally posted by: whismermill
a reply to: Gothmog

not really, the preservative is added to prevent cross contamination in multidose vials. And no, "heavy metals" are not added to extend the expiry date of a vaccine, but to booster the immune response. So less antigen is needed to induce immunity. Which should be hailed as a good thing, less volume to be injected, hence less exposure to "toxic compounds"

and out of date is still out of date, it still gets tossed when the expiry date has passed. It doesn't matter if the expiry date is 1 month after production, or set for 2 years after production. And logic applied: the shorter the life of a vaccine, the bigger the chance that the vaccine will pass its expiry date before use, the more product will be wasted, the more product is being sold, the more money the company will generate. so extending the life of the vaccine is not beneficial for a company

There is no safe amount of injected mercury for adults, let alone a neonate.

[citation needed]

originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass

Reference please?

And could you reply to my answer on my previous post?
Thank you.

originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: Gothmog

Mercury is one source of poisoning. Not the only one.

So you're re-hashing a Facebook meme from David "Avocado" Wolfe which was "sourced" from David Icke.
Way to science!

Way to science? And that somehow changes mercury content and the biological outcome? That response didn't really deserve a response. Pharma has an entire network of writers, media shills and trolls. You could apply. It seems you have some of the skills required.

Yes, way to science.
Real science tends to more specific than your vacuous meme.
So which vaccine does it apply to?
Is it talking about thimerosal or mercury?
What type of mercury exactly?

What biological outcome are you on about as your meme doesn't mention one (it doesn't actually say much of anything else either but...)

And as for your last comment, I see you've outed yourself (again)

a reply to: InverseLookingGlass

it would help, for the sake of the argument, that you would precise what kind of mercury you are talking about. And while we're at it, as you claim there is no safe amount of injected "mercury", is there a safe amount of ingested "mercury"?

originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass

That would be great.

This is silly. Wild polio is nearly extinct, and it's still responsible for the vast majority of polio cases. As the number of wild polio cases goes down, the proportion of vaccine-derived polio cases will increase, but the total number of cases still decreases, and that's a good thing. The vaccine-derived polio incidence will drop to zero when it becomes feasible to switch everyone to the inactivated vaccine, but it'll be a few years before we can do that. Until then, we'll just have to be content with a mere 99.9% reduction since we started vaccinating.

I'm sorry it's not in meme form, but further information is here:

www.polioeradication.org...

a reply to: InverseLookingGlass

A meme isn't fact, back that claim up.
Also Japan that is number two on the infant death list vaccinated too, so what's the deal there?