posted on Sep, 18 2015 @ 05:23 PM
The folks over at icr.org (Institute of Creation Research) seem to think they have scientific evidence. www.icr.org...
Here's a typical abstract:
The Chasm Between the Human and Chimpanzee Genomes: A Review of the Evolutionary Literature
Evidence for Creation
by Jerry Bergman, Ph.D., and Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D.
In M. Horstemeyer, ed., 2013, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Creationism, Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship. Visit
the ICC at www.creationicc.org.
Data has been extracted from secular literature that is contrary to the common claim that very few genetic differences exist between chimpanzees and
humans. We found that significant reported differences exist in genomic similarity and gene regulation between chimpanzees and humans. The DNA
sequence differences and genetic mechanisms reported in the literature support the conclusion that significant and unbridgeable genetic differences
exist between humans and chimpanzees that defy evolutionary claims of a common ancestor.
There's only one problem: No one ever, ever goes into the lab to challenge an experiment by repeating it and demonstrating that the results produce a
different outcome. Nor do they do their own hard research. There isn't a single bench scientist in the whole bunch!
Every paper they "publish" refutes the hard evidence with lengthy diatribes against the results of experimental, peer-reviewed research.
The DNA sequence differences and genetic mechanisms reported in the literature support the conclusion that significant and unbridgeable genetic
differences exist between humans and chimpanzees that defy evolutionary claims of a common ancestor.
I'd really like to have a look at that magic wand they're using to draw a "conclusion" which could only be made by accumulating experimental data and
then using computational analysis to compare the sequences and mechanisms.
The lack of critical thinking by followers of Creationism is astounding. It may be in the genes?
edit on 18-9-2015 by Phantom423 because: (no reason given)