It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to a few scientist, yes, there were indications of a cooling trend. On the other hand, there were at the same time, far more scientists who were concerned about warming caused by the combustion of fossil fuels.
Back in the 60`s we were heading into a ice age and now we are heading into a warming age .
I thought those melting glaciers were a good thing. Except maybe when they melt and the water ends up in the ocean, I guess.
Yea it has been dry in California the past while .
Maybe. But the farmers (not all "large Agra groups") are using ground water. That's not where most drinking water in California comes from.
do you suppose that the water management of California could be better served towards the public then maybe the large Agra groups siphoning off more then their fair share .
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Phage
If mankind caused the problem then mankind deserves the consequences.
And doesn't "deserve" to do something about their mistakes?
I don't think I like your world much.
You mean 100% agreement? Of course not, there never is. That's a strawman argument.
So even in the scientific community there is not a complete consensus .
Do you know why data is adjusted? What manipulated data? What cherry picked data?
Facts about adjusted data ,manipulated and cherry picked data
computer models that diverge with every hour from reality
Seems you know next to nothing about the science or the IPCC.
seems theat the 21st century has produced a group of scientist willing to go to no lengths to make their studies say what a group (IPCC) would like them to say