It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Triton1128
I thought they already explained the North American waste land and demise of dinosaurs by the impactor in the Yucatan Peninsula?
The 'round the world Tritium, cretaceous boundary layer? Or is this a different event?
Chicxulub
There really was a flood. It did not blanket the earth; it just flooded the seacoasts where a lot of the civilizations were. It happened because of glacial melt about 12,000 to 14,000 years ago. we're still coming off an Ice Age, and when the ice surrounding Hudson Bay melted a whole lot of seawater rushed out raised the level of the oceans about 40-60 feet in a day.
the same exact thing happened to another lake in Canada where the dam broke and the water rushed out of Canada into Washington State and carved out the steppes of eastern Washington on its way to the Pacific Ocean resulting in the barren land that is there now. One of these is recognized as probably true by science; the other is regarded as mythical.
But there are legends of a flood in nearly every oral tradition, from China and Japan to aboriginal America to the Middle East. The story of Noah is just a variation on that theme. There was no actual Ark. There was no "animals 2 x 2." None of that makes any sense at all, but people did survive the flood and lived to tell the tale--changed with artistic license over thousands of years.
Its hard to date the (where or when )the impact was because it was most likely on top of a mile+ thick ice sheet. ( no impact crater )
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Triton1128
Its hard to date the (where or when )the impact was because it was most likely on top of a mile+ thick ice sheet. ( no impact crater )
An impactor of sufficient size, say five miles across moving 15 - 40 KM per second, would penetrate a mile thick ice sheet in a fraction of a second, most assuredly leaving a crater.
These kinds of world changing impacts penetrate into the mantle tens of miles, regardless of whats on the crust at the time.
link to image
But what if it were an air burst event. Like the Tunguska event.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Triton1128
But what if it were an air burst event. Like the Tunguska event.
Those don't leave craters, only direct impacts do that. Burn everything, make a mess of downed trees for miles… still, no crater was found at Tunguska.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Triton1128
you can look a lot closer to " home " for the backstory of the flood myths [ at least for middle eastern cultures ]
the black sea innundation
various events in the med
various events in the PG
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
*snip*
The thing is this was global...I have seen interesting evidence of Earth having a watery band around it and this may have been artificially destroyed,hence the deluge from *the sky*..
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
*snip*
The thing is this was global...I have seen interesting evidence of Earth having a watery band around it and this may have been artificially destroyed,hence the deluge from *the sky*..
I would love to see some of that, if you have links. This topic has always been of interest to me. I believe it was global as well. Thanks.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
*snip*
The thing is this was global...I have seen interesting evidence of Earth having a watery band around it and this may have been artificially destroyed,hence the deluge from *the sky*..
I would love to see some of that, if you have links. This topic has always been of interest to me. I believe it was global as well. Thanks.
So you discount the tens of thousands (if not more) of core samples taken all over the world that all indicate that there was no such global event?