It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: intrptr
States rights ultimately supersede federal law . This is what the rebel flag thing is really all about.
Not really.
Idealistically? Sure. In practice? Nope.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
It’s a straw man in the sense that the issue has been decided by the Supreme Court
You could argue all you want and they did in the court case and lost.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
Since when doe the issue of marriage become something that the Fed Gov need to chime in on? It is not mentioned in the constitution because it is not a fed gov matter. This is an usurpation of the fed gov and is being treated as such. Fcuck really !! who f'ing cares what people do in their bedroom anyway?! I do not; I also do not understand why states feel the need to regulate and license marriage. C'mon you people that aren't being paid to be here, who in their proper mind falls in love then decides the their love needs state or federal involvement?!!! The IRS, that's who. After the money what is the point of the marriage license anyway.
Pick your fights with the party that is infringing on it. The GOVERNMENT not between ourselves; stye know if we keep fighting, we are not paying attention to the problem which is them.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
The federal government has no place telling states what do do regarding marriage licenses either! The gubmnt has stepped way over it's legal boundaries with this ruling and it is normal for states to respond in kind. I personally do not have a problem with gay marriage so this is not a personal issue to me however, states have the right and responsibility to manage Marriage licenses, driver's licenses etc..
If you take your own personal views out of your answer, you will see that what Texas (and soon to follow others) is a natural and expected reaction to the illegal usurpation of states rights.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
Trumping constitutional rights of religious institutions.....and also tryign to mandate that states dont have a choice.....
If the gov really REALLY wanted equality? Thy would remove themselves completely from the process, and from even having to have a license from a gov institution to get married......
That way anyone could be married no matter their sex, and the forum inwhich you were married would send the info to the gov , and then they would institute the benefits......
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
You are aware of the 10th amendment arent you? you know , thats part of the constitution too, or are we only allowed to enforce the parts we agree with>?
originally posted by: notmyrealname
Since when doe the issue of marriage become something that the Fed Gov need to chime in on? It is not mentioned in the constitution because it is not a fed gov matter.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
originally posted by: buster2010
Well if Texas doesn't want to follow federal law then the federal government should cut off federal aid to that state until they start to follow the law. The Texas AG has no right in telling state employees that they can decide on if a couple can get a license depending on that employees faith.
The federal government has no place telling states what do do regarding marriage licenses either! The gubmnt has stepped way over it's legal boundaries with this ruling and it is normal for states to respond in kind. I personally do not have a problem with gay marriage so this is not a personal issue to me however, states have the right and responsibility to manage Marriage licenses, driver's licenses etc..
If you take your own personal views out of your answer, you will see that what Texas (and soon to follow others) is a natural and expected reaction to the illegal usurpation of states rights.