It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rep. Gwen Graham (D-Fla.) introduced legislation Tuesday that would prevent members of Congress from using taxpayer funds on first-class plane tickets. The bill would also ban lawmakers from using government funds for long-term car leases for personal use. "It's a commonsense idea that Republicans and Democrats can both agree on: members of Congress shouldn't be able to charge taxpayers for first-class airfare or long-term personal car leases," said Graham, who will likely be one of the most vulnerable House Democrats in the next election cycle. A statement from Graham's office said the bill is the first of multiple "anti-perk bills" to curb luxuries for members of Congress. Rep. Rod Blum (R-Iowa) is currently listed as the bill's only cosponsor. Lawmakers of both parties have introduced similar legislation in the past. One bipartisan measure last year, titled the "If Our Military Has to Fly Coach Then So Should Congress Act," would also force lawmakers to fly in coach class with taxpayer money. However, it did provide exceptions for first-class travel to accommodate medical problems or disabilities. Another bill offered by Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) last year would merely limit the purchase of first-class domestic airfare with taxpayer funds in certain circumstances. Those exceptions included if the flight was at least five hours or coach-class seats were unavailable in situations requiring urgent travel.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Puppylove
I love this bill and the purpose behind it.
It really IS a common sense idea, but there doesn't seem to BE much common sense with these policymakers anymore. Hopefully this one goes through, it would Definitely be a step in the right direction.
originally posted by: greencmp
It is tempting to declare that these minimal targeted stunts won't get us over the hump...
originally posted by: Puppylove
I personally am more upset about people who already have it good, and already have tons of money living it up on our dime than anyone poor. These people don't need to be given a thing and we're renting cars for them that they drive for far longer than their job requires and flying them first class which is an unnecessary luxury. If they want to fly first class they can pay for it themselves with their fortunes, and if they want a car to go sightseeing and having fun in and not just get to where they're supposed to be for the job we pay them for, than they should damn well pay for it themselves.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Puppylove
I personally am more upset about people who already have it good, and already have tons of money living it up on our dime than anyone poor. These people don't need to be given a thing and we're renting cars for them that they drive for far longer than their job requires and flying them first class which is an unnecessary luxury. If they want to fly first class they can pay for it themselves with their fortunes, and if they want a car to go sightseeing and having fun in and not just get to where they're supposed to be for the job we pay them for, than they should damn well pay for it themselves.
Hate to put it to ya,but much of the business world flies Business/first class... It is somewhat a norm for many...Why does that upset you so much? Nothing like sitting jammed in a seat for 18 hours...over and over... You might see it as Luxury, but many do not...
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Puppylove
Sorry, it took me a while to get to this, and it's late and I'm tired so this will be brief.
Like it or not, congressmen have a certain level of influence, and who that influence goes to largely has to do with two things:
1. Who will reelect them.
2. Who will pay them.
Any notions of cutting pay from members of congress are bad. The taxpayers essentially have their own lobby and it's called campaign funding. Their salary is our lobbying money. The corporations all have their own lobbying arms as well, campaign funding, nice dinners, vacation homes, do nothing jobs post congress, and so on. If we want congressmen to act in our favor rather than the favor of the corporations it not only means that we need to leave them with perks like first class (which actually has practical use) but that we need to pay them more overall.
They hold the power to vote in the laws they adhere to, they will never vote away a benefit. Instead the way to fight is by voting them more money than the corporations give them.
This would even work out well for us financially, as we would get better legislation for that money, which in turn would reduce spending as there would be fewer corporate favors going on.
What I just described is a very corrupt system, but that's the reality of our situation today. It is 100% corrupt, and you won't fix it through idealism. You can however work within it using what effectively amounts to bribes.