It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It just seems strange to me, how everything played out, and how all the Trillions of tax dollars we throw at the Military were unable to be put to their proper use that day, the defense of our country. I would like an explanation of that.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Jchristopher5
This thread is a Gish Gallop. Funny because I usually don't see this arguing tactic used outside of Creationist debates.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: soulwaxer
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
You can fool some people sometimes.
But you can't fool all the people all the time.
soulwaxer
And you can't seem to provide a articulate rebuttal of my post.
every time....
originally posted by: peacefulpete
Planes of light aluminum can't pierce into steel towers like that.
Planes have never been known to vaporize completely like all 4 did on 9-11,
And people say the steel towers just fell inward, from fire, that couldn't melt steel like that.
The Pentagon's refusal to release a single photo from their surveillance cameras that show an airplane crashing into it, rather than a small missile or something.
How come this plane was mostly vaporized like the others? Why wasn't there normal airplane wreckage at any of the 4 crash sites?
Well those are some of the physical impossibilites of the day.
Surely no one will legitimately answer these points either
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
the Pentagon "plane" debris that was carried away by about a dozen people,
the presence of thermite in the tower debris,
and the destruction of all surveillance video footage from businesses near the Pentagon.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
even the official story claims the planes got so hot they "vaporized".
And show me anything that shows 747 (not a 757) wreckage in Pennsylvania. There were a few scraps of metal and some small craters in dirt. Do you even realize how big a 747 is? There's literally no way that hole in the Pentagon could've been made by a 747, especially when it supposedly vaporized on impact.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: peacefulpete
Planes of light aluminum can't pierce into steel towers like that.
What makes you claim that?
Planes have never been known to vaporize completely like all 4 did on 9-11,
Yet another truther lie, why do you claim all 4 planers vaporised?
And people say the steel towers just fell inward, from fire, that couldn't melt steel like that.
Wrong, only truthers claim steel was melted.
The Pentagon's refusal to release a single photo from their surveillance cameras that show an airplane crashing into it, rather than a small missile or something.
They have released it, truthers just refuse to accept reality.
How come this plane was mostly vaporized like the others? Why wasn't there normal airplane wreckage at any of the 4 crash sites?
There was, but again you refuse to accept it.
Well those are some of the physical impossibilites of the day.
As shown, they were not physical impossibilities, just trut6hers poor understanding of physics and how things really work.
Surely no one will legitimately answer these points either
Of course you will totally ignore the answers, as they do not fit your silly conspiracy theory!
originally posted by: glast82
I hope you all are aware that Active Thermitic Material was Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe.
The hijackers did not put it there.
This can be found at The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31
Also this is very telling..
www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: illuminnaughty
The only planes allowed to fly were the ones flying the bin ladin family safely back to Saudi Arabia
However, it was later revealed that the "bin Laden flight" left the US more than a week after the attacks, on September 20th
And ultimately the 9/11 Commission would offer the following commentary on the issue: Flights of Saudi Nationals Leaving the United States Three questions have arisen with respect to the departure of Saudi nationals from the United States in the immediate aftermath of 9/11: (1) Did any flights of Saudi nationals take place before national airspace reopened on September 13, 2001? (2) Was there any political intervention to facilitate the departure of Saudi nationals? (3) Did the FBI screen Saudi nationals thoroughly before their departure? First, we found no evidence that any flights of Saudi nationals, domestic or international, took place before the reopening of national airspace on the morning of September 13, 2001.24 To the contrary, every flight we have identified occurred after national airspace reopened. Second, we found no evidence of political intervention. We found no evidence that anyone at theWhite House above the level of Richard Clarke participated in a decision on the departure of Saudi nationals. The issue came up in one of the many video teleconferences of the interagency group Clarke chaired, and Clarke said he approved of how the FBI was dealing with the matter when it came up for interagency discussion at his level. Clarke told us,“I asked the FBI, Dale Watson . . . to handle that, to check to see if that was all right with them, to see if they wanted access to any of these people, and to get back to me. And if they had no objections, it would be fine with me.” Clarke added,“I have no recollection of clearing it with anybody at the White House.” Although White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card remembered someone telling him about the Saudi request shortly after 9/11, he said he had not talked to the Saudis and did not ask anyone to do anything about it. The President andVice President told us they were not aware of the issue at all until it surfaced much later in the media. None of the officials we interviewed recalled any intervention or direction on this matter from any political appointee. Third, we believe that the FBI conducted a satisfactory screening of Saudi nationals who left the United States on charter flights. The Saudi government was advised of and agreed to the FBI’s requirements that passengers be identified and checked against various databases before the flights departed. The Federal Aviation Administration representative working in the FBI operations center made sure that the FBI was aware of the flights of Saudi nationals and was able to screen the passengers before they were allowed to depart. The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their departures.They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to the 9/11 attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion. Our own independent review of the Saudi nationals involved confirms that no one with known links to terrorism departed on these flights. Chapter 10, 9/11 Commission Report
Steel can't be WEAKENED by fire like that
originally posted by: liejunkie01
a reply to: peacefulpete
Steel can't be WEAKENED by fire like that
I believe you need to study up on your metallurgy. Start from the begining and work your way up to the atomic space lattice structure and how heat excites the atoms in steel.
If what you say is true, tgen why do we waste our time fireproofing the steel strucutres in buildings?
The building I am a part of constructing at the moment is 5 stories tall, and you guessed it, every single beam has been coated with fireproofing.
Every single point you make is moot because it is obvious that you do not have a clue as to what you are talking about.