It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
U.S. adults see various science-related topics much differently than do America's top scientists, with the two groups expressing widely divergent views on the safety of genetically modified foods, climate change, human evolution, the use of animals in research and vaccines, according to a new report published by Pew Research Center.
When it comes to ... evolution, a majority of adults see scientists as generally in agreement ... that humans have evolved over time (66%), though a sizeable minority see scientists as divided... Perceptions of where the scientific community stands on ... evolution tend to be associated with individual views on the issue.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Blame the religious right for the split. It is their propaganda distributed through right wing news outlets, like Fox News that causes this.
Worldwide Rankings for education
scientists have seen macro mutations of a species but have never observed a pig giving birth to a horse or a fish crawling out the sea and turning into a dog ,also science states that the hairs standing up on the back off your neck is left over from stoneage times and we no longer need it ,,,
originally posted by: stuthealien
how about blame scientists for being bigheaded and refusing to believe they could be wrong.
einsteins speed of light a constant: wrong link link2
gravity a constant:wrong link
scientists have seen macro mutations of a species but have never observed a pig giving birth to a horse or a fish crawling out the sea and turning into a dog ,also science states that the hairs standing up on the back off your neck is left over from stoneage times and we no longer need it ,,,
that is pure conjecture a lie a guess unless you have a fully alive stoneage man today how could you prove this??????????????
originally posted by: stuthealien
a reply to: Krazysh0t
but gravity does fluctuate and the speed of light can be manipulated this is fact yet you try and deflame it ,and those links prove you get it oh so wrong and even when the untrained masses point out your flaws it takes you years to correct your mistakes and admit it .
Since Cavendish first measured Newton's Gravitational constant 200 years ago, "Big G" remains one of the most elusive constants in physics. The value of big G tells us how much gravitational force acts between two masses separated by a known distance. In Einstein's language of general relativity, it tells us the amount of space-time curvature due to a given mass. Together with Planck's constant and the speed of light it is considered to be one of the most fundamental constants in nature. Big G is a necessary ingredient in determining the mass of the earth, the moon, the sun and the other planets.
Several measurements in the past decade did not succeed in improving our knowledge of big G's value. To the contrary, the variation between different measurements forced the CODATA committee, which determines the internationally accepted standard values, to increase the uncertainty from 0.013% for the value quoted in 1987 to the twelve times larger uncertainty of 0.15% for the 1998 "official" value. This situation is an embarrassment to modern physics, considering that the intrinsic strength of electromagnetism, for instance, is known 2.5 million times more precisely and is steadily being improved. (The situation of G becomes more understandable if one considers the weakness of gravity: the total gravitational force twisting on the pendulum of a typical Cavendish torsion balance is only equivalent to the weight of a bacteria and that small force must be measured very precisely.)
The question of how/why do we know that G (and other constants) are indeed constant was udressed in Physics.SE: What is the proof that the universal constants (G, ℏ, …) are really constant in time and space? are really constant in time and space?
Regarding the claim that the data isn't made public. I couldn't find any evidence that labs are constantly remeasuring and updating G and I couldn't find that this data is hidden. The data is made public through journal articles. Also, the value is not updated constantly as the National Institute of Standards and Technology published a figure that was last updated at 2010.
infact doesnt link 2 prove sheldrake in this particular instance is speaking the truth and you cannot face up to your own deception to the general populace
originally posted by: WatchingY0u
When you think about it the human brain and the body disapproves evolution. Something that complex was obviously consciously created to perform the specific tasks that the human brain and body carrys out, things just don't evolve into that. That's like saying a house evolved from a tree, a house was consciously created for a specific purpose.
how about blame scientists for being bigheaded and refusing to believe they could be wrong.
scientists have seen macro mutations of a species but have never observed a pig giving birth to a horse or a fish crawling out the sea and turning into a dog
,also science states that the hairs standing up on the back off your neck is left over from stoneage times and we no longer need it ,,, that is pure conjecture a lie a guess unless you have a fully alive stoneage man today how could you prove this??????????????