It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: swanne
originally posted by: [post=19112784]Soylent Green Is but if it is self-illuminating, then I assure you that would be jaw-dropping information.
And even if it is self-illuminating (which I very much doubt), it doesn't necessarily imply that it would be artificial in nature - a simple phosphorescent substance could be the candidate.
I have already addressed the object in question in the above post.
Your "theories" are wacked out and have no scientific basis. It's a UV image of IO not some planet core.
I suppose we need to keep "self-illuminating" on the table.
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
Don't know if you ever heard of this alternative theory of planet formation.
I thought maybe you might find this interesting.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Now, we are collectively looking at a relic of creation. But what is it we are actually looking at??? An asteroid, a dwarf planet, or might it be, something entirely different. We see a light!
Well, we see a bright patch, not necessarily a light. We don't "know" if it is reflective or self-illuminating -- but if it is self-illuminating, then I assure you that would be jaw-dropping information. However, there is no reason to believe it is NOT just something that is relatively highly reflective.
As for the term "dwarf planet" or "asteroid", they are just different words for the general "lumps of stuff floating around in the solar system". Don't get too caught up in words.
originally posted by: Ross 54
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Now, we are collectively looking at a relic of creation. But what is it we are actually looking at??? An asteroid, a dwarf planet, or might it be, something entirely different. We see a light!
Well, we see a bright patch, not necessarily a light. We don't "know" if it is reflective or self-illuminating -- but if it is self-illuminating, then I assure you that would be jaw-dropping information. However, there is no reason to believe it is NOT just something that is relatively highly reflective.
As for the term "dwarf planet" or "asteroid", they are just different words for the general "lumps of stuff floating around in the solar system". Don't get too caught up in words.
I respectfully disagree with the assertion that there is no reason to believe it (the bright spot on Ceres) is not just something that is relatively highly reflective. Some of the latest images of Ceres show the bright spot on the floor of the crater, surrounded in darkness. That location has already crossed over the terminator between day and night.
How can a merely reflective object reflect light when there is none? The explanation that the bright spot is on elevated terrain, and so, is catching the last rays of the Sun, even though the crater floor is dark appears to be invalid.
NASA looked carefully for elevated terrain at the site of the bright spot, because they were searching for evidence of an icy volcano. They found no such elevated terrain. Their finding seemed solid enough to them that they virtually ruled out the possibility of an icy volcano.
They're already let us see an image with the bright spot surrounded by darkness, and dismissed the only likely routine explanation, a mound or peak, as part of their own analysis.
If it turns out to be a basin of silver or gold they will never tell us. Theres gold in them hills how many private companies in space technology would suddenly spring up.
originally posted by: Ross 54
I respectfully disagree with the assertion that there is no reason to believe it (the bright spot on Ceres) is not just something that is relatively highly reflective. Some of the latest images of Ceres show the bright spot on the floor of the crater, surrounded in darkness. That location has already crossed over the terminator between day and night.
In this case, the feature is very reflective. There isn't something there signaling us actively. It's signaling us passively; it's reflecting the sunlight. It's consistent with reflecting all of the light if the spot is small enough. Now, we don't know what size it is, so we can't tell if the albedo is 40 percent, 60 percent, 80 percent or 100 percent, but it's probably in that range someplace. One thing that's very good in the solar system at reflecting sunlight is ice. For example, [Saturn's moon] Enceladus has an albedo of about 100 percent.
But there are people who are holding out for salt — not necessarily table salt, but salts of various minerals that may be white in appearance. So we have sort of a dichotomy of opinion in the team as to whether this has a dry or wet explanation. But we'll get to the bottom of this when we can resolve the bottom of the feature.